Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Life Science and Agriculture Research

Evaluation of Biopesticide (Urtica spp.) Against Insect Pests and Diseases of Sweet Potato for Food Security

Ernestina Narveh Awarikabey; Ernest Baafi; Kofi Frimpong-Anin; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: The sweetpotato weevil and sweetpotato virus disease (SPVD) are major biotic constraints that completely devastate sweetpotato fields and cause 50 – 100 % yield losses. Management includes cultural practices, tolerant varieties, chemical pesticides and integrated management strategies. Botanicals are gaining popularity in Integrated Pest and Disease Management strategies. Their insecticidal and fungicidal activities, biodegradability and safety increase their probability as alternatives to chemical pesticides. Urtica spp. are known for their insecticidal properties, but their efficacy in the management of the sweetpotato weevil and SPVD has not been documented. Objective: A field trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of Urtica spp. (Adamfo Pa) against sweetpotato pests and diseases in the forest and savannah transition agroecological zones of Ghana in 2025. Method: A Split-plot design with three replications was used. Three different rates of the extract, reference fungicide (Mancozeb WP) and biopesticide (Bypel), plus a control, were tested on Cylas sp. and SPVD susceptible sweetpotato variety. Results: No disease incidence was recorded. The test product at the application rate of 500 ml/100 L of water per week was effective in reducing pest infestation and damage on the leaves and storage roots. It was also found to be efficacious in minimising sweetpotato storage root damage and increasing yield. Conclusion: The study confirms that Urtica sp. extracts exhibit insecticidal and fungicidal properties that act as insect repellents or growth inhibitors. It is certified for use on carrots, beans, potatoes and strawberries, and recently extended to sweetpotatoes due to the outcome of this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No disease incidence was recorded in the sweetpotato field trial.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
disease incidencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Urtica spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“No disease incidence was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The test product at 500 ml/100 L of water per week reduced pest infestation and damage on leaves and storage roots.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
test product at the application rate of 500 ml/100 L of water per weeke0
Outcome
pest infestation and damage on the leaves and storage rootse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Urtica spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The test product at the application rate of 500 ml/100 L of water per week was effective in reducing pest infestation and damage on the leaves and storage roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The product was efficacious in minimising sweetpotato storage root damage.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Urtica spp.t1
Outcome
storage root damagee0
Direction
minimisinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Urtica spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacious in minimising sweetpotato storage root damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The product increased sweetpotato yield.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Urtica spp.t1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Urtica spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1438 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Urtica sp. extracts have insecticidal and fungicidal properties acting as insect repellents or growth inhibitors.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Urtica sp. extractse0
Outcome
insecticidal and fungicidal propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“Urtica spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Urtica sp. extracts exhibit insecticidal and fungicidal properties that act as insect repellents or growth inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1593 · show in text ↑