Paper · 2026 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Characterizing yield through wheat’s perception of chronological progression: a multi-omics plant time warping approach

Lukas Roth; Juan M Herrera; Lilia Levy Häner; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To address challenges in food security, a better understanding of crop performance under varying and changing environmental conditions is required. Plant Time Warping (PTW) is a deep learning model that integrates high-throughput field phenotyping data with genomic and environmental information to predict wheat yield. PTW leverages image time series, genetic markers, and environmental covariates to learn genotype-specific physiological responses to temperature and vapor pressure deficit. Compared to mere genomic prediction models, PTW demonstrates superior performance when predicting yield in unseen environments across 48 year-locations in Europe. The PTW model captures non-linear growth responses varying with phenological stages and identifies distinct patterns associated with yield performance and stability. Specifically, varieties with higher yield stability exhibit reduced sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit around 1.5 kPa and distinctive temperature responses during emergence and senescence. The learned response pattern enable retrospective and prospective yield predictions, providing a foundation for location-specific variety recommendations and targeted breeding strategies. The integration of phenomic, genomic, and enviromic data has the potential to substantially advance research in climate adaptation strategies for crop production by addressing generalization challenges of predictions to novel environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PTW predicts yield in unseen environments with superior performance compared with genomic prediction models

Outcome
performance when predicting yield in unseen environmentse1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
genomic prediction modelse1
Setting
48 year-locations in Europee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared to mere genomic prediction models, PTW demonstrates superior performance when predicting yield in unseen environments across 48 year-locations in Europe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–655 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

PTW captures non-linear growth responses that vary with phenological stages

Organ / stage
phenological stagese2
Outcome
non-linear growth responsese2
Qualifier
varying with phenological stagese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The PTW model captures non-linear growth responses varying with phenological stages and identifies distinct patterns associated with yield performance and stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–821 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

PTW identifies distinct response patterns associated with yield performance and stability

Outcome
distinct patternse2
Qualifier
associated with yield performance and stabilitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The PTW model captures non-linear growth responses varying with phenological stages and identifies distinct patterns associated with yield performance and stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–821 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties with higher yield stability show reduced sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit around 1.5 kPa

Material
varieties with higher yield stabilitye3
Treatment
vapor pressure deficit around 1.5 kPae3
Outcome
sensitivity to vapor pressure deficite3
Direction
reducede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Specifically, varieties with higher yield stability exhibit reduced sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit around 1.5 kPa and distinctive temperature responses during emergence and senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1013 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties with higher yield stability show distinctive temperature responses during emergence and senescence

Material
varieties with higher yield stabilitye3
Organ / stage
emergence and senescencee3
Outcome
temperature responsese3
Qualifier
distinctivee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Specifically, varieties with higher yield stability exhibit reduced sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit around 1.5 kPa and distinctive temperature responses during emergence and senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1013 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The learned response patterns enable retrospective and prospective yield predictions

Outcome
retrospective and prospective yield predictionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The learned response pattern enable retrospective and prospective yield predictions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1097 · show in text ↑
e5

“to predict wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–318 · show in text ↑