Paper · 2026 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Semi-arid grasses combine contrasting strategies of dehydration tolerance associated with carbohydrate storage and embolism resistance under drought

Maria Dolores Hidalgo-Galvez; Chaïa Akhoun-Piernicka; Gerónimo A Cardozo; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dehydration tolerance and embolism resistance contribute to plant drought survival, but their limits and combinations in perennial grasses remain unexplored. We investigated four grasses (Stipa species and Dactylis subspecies) from Mediterranean sites prone to intense summer drought. Plant tolerance to soil water deficit and tissue dehydration, embolism resistance (P50), and water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) were measured under severe drought. Dactylis were more dehydration tolerant, reaching 50% survival at a lower soil water potential (-6.07 MPa) than Stipa (-2.64 MPa), and at a lower leaf base water content (32.8%) than Stipa (50.0%). Dactylis accumulated higher WSCs in leaf bases [479 mg g-1 dry mass (DM), high fructan concentration] than Stipa (17 mg g-1 DM, high sucrose concentration). WSCs contributed 47% (Dactylis) and 29% (Stipa) to osmotic adjustment. However, Stipa had higher embolism resistance (P50= -8.7 MPa) than Dactylis (-2.9 MPa). Plants from the most arid sites had the highest dehydration tolerance, while embolism resistance was uncorrelated with aridity of the sites of origin. We found the highest embolism resistance and dehydration tolerance reported for herbaceous species. We showed that semi-arid grasses combine contrasting strategies to survive drought. Assessing these strategy combinations is crucial to predicting plant resilience under climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dactylis reached 50% survival at lower soil water potential than Stipa.

Taxon
DactylisDactylise0
Outcome
50% survivale0
Direction
lowere0
Value
-6.07 MPae0
Qualifier
Stipa (-2.64 MPa)e0
Comparator
Stipae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis
Dactylis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)foxypar4 on Flickr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dactylis were more dehydration tolerant, reaching 50% survival at a lower soil water potential (-6.07 MPa) than Stipa (-2.64 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dactylis reached 50% survival at lower leaf base water content than Stipa.

Taxon
DactylisDactylist0
Outcome
leaf base water contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
32.8%e0
Qualifier
Stipa (50.0%)e0
Comparator
Stipae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis
Dactylis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)foxypar4 on Flickr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and at a lower leaf base water content (32.8%) than Stipa (50.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dactylis were more dehydration tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dactylis accumulated more water-soluble carbohydrates in leaf bases than Stipa.

Taxon
DactylisDactylise0
Outcome
WSCs in leaf basese0
Direction
highere0
Value
479 mg g-1 dry mass (DM)e0
Qualifier
high fructan concentratione0
Comparator
Stipae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis
Dactylis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)foxypar4 on Flickr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dactylis accumulated higher WSCs in leaf bases [479 mg g-1 dry mass (DM), high fructan concentration] than Stipa (17 mg g-1 DM, high sucrose concentration)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stipa had 17 mg g-1 DM water-soluble carbohydrates, with high sucrose concentration.

Taxon
StipaStipae0
Outcome
Stipae0
Value
17 mg g-1 DMe0
Qualifier
high sucrose concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa
Stipa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“than Stipa (17 mg g-1 DM, high sucrose concentration)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble carbohydrates contributed 47% to osmotic adjustment in Dactylis.

Taxon
DactylisDactylise0
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente0
Value
47%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis
Dactylis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)foxypar4 on Flickr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WSCs contributed 47% (Dactylis) and 29% (Stipa) to osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble carbohydrates contributed 29% to osmotic adjustment in Stipa.

Taxon
StipaStipae0
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente0
Value
29%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa
Stipa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WSCs contributed 47% (Dactylis) and 29% (Stipa) to osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stipa had higher embolism resistance than Dactylis.

Taxon
StipaStipae0
Outcome
embolism resistancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
-8.7 MPae0
Qualifier
Dactylis (-2.9 MPa)e0
Comparator
Dactylise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stipa
Stipa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stipa had higher embolism resistance (P50= -8.7 MPa) than Dactylis (-2.9 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–961 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from the most arid sites had the highest dehydration tolerance.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
dehydration tolerancee0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
most arid sitese0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants from the most arid sites had the highest dehydration tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1032 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embolism resistance was uncorrelated with aridity of sites of origin.

Taxon
grassest0
Outcome
embolism resistancee0
Setting
sites of origine0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“embolism resistance was uncorrelated with aridity of the sites of origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These grasses showed the highest embolism resistance and dehydration tolerance reported for herbaceous species.

Taxon
grassest0
Outcome
embolism resistance and dehydration tolerancee0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“We found the highest embolism resistance and dehydration tolerance reported for herbaceous species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑