Paper · 2011 · Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University AVESIS

SHOOT GROWTH CURVE ANALYSIS OF MAIZE CULTVARS UNDER BORON DEFICIENCY

Karadavut, U.; Palta, C.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted in 2003-2004 in Karaaslan, Soil and Water Sources Research Institute, Konya the largest province in Central Anatolia Region. There is boron deficiency in soils. Thirteen corn cultivars (TTM 8119, MAT 97, RX 770, PIAVE, DK 585, DK 647, LUCE, TTM 815, LG 55, LG 60, T 1595, BC 566 and P 3394) were tested in completely randomized design with four replications. 0 (B-)-deficiency- and 3.0 kg B/ha (B+) of boron levels were applied as boric acid (H3BO3) before seed sowing. Richards Model was used estimation of growth. The Weighted Sum of Squares of Residual (WSS), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Schwartz criterion (SC) were used as comparison criteria. As result, 3.0 kg B/ha (B+) dose revealed better growth than 0 (B-). Average dry matter accumulation in boron deficient plots (245.3 g/plant) was lower than the other plots (263.8 g/plant). But, boron deficiency of plot yields (1028.8 kg/da) was higher than for other plot yields (1024.8 kg/da).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3.0 kg B/ha dose produced better maize growth than boron deficiency.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
3.0 kg B/ha (B+)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
0 (B-)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE CULTVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“As result, 3.0 kg B/ha (B+) dose revealed better growth than 0 (B-).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average dry matter accumulation under boron deficiency was 245.3 g/plant, lower than 263.8 g/plant in the other plots.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
boron deficient plotse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
245.3 g/plante0
Qualifier
263.8 g/plante0
Comparator
the other plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE CULTVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average dry matter accumulation in boron deficient plots (245.3 g/plant) was lower than the other plots (263.8 g/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron-deficient plots yielded 1028.8 kg/da, higher than the 1024.8 kg/da in other plots.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
boron deficiencye0
Outcome
plot yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1028.8 kg/dae0
Qualifier
1024.8 kg/dae0
Comparator
other plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE CULTVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“But, boron deficiency of plot yields (1028.8 kg/da) was higher than for other plot yields (1024.8 kg/da).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–991 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.