Paper · 2026 · Toxins

Stability and Efficacy of Fungicides Registered for Organic and Commercial Wheat Production in Hungary Against Fusarium Head Blight—A Comprehensive Methodology to Enhance Food Safety

Tamás Meszlényi; Katalin Ács; Attila Berényi; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is one of the most significant diseases in wheat globally, affecting about 200 million tons of grain per year through mycotoxin contamination. Besides yield losses, mycotoxin contamination is a major concern. FHB resistance in wheat is partial and polygenic, and since the efficacy of plant protection measures is generally weak-to-moderate, an integrated approach is needed for successful control. We evaluated a more comprehensive methodology for improved protection; in this two-year study, five registered organic products and six conventional products were compared under artificial and natural infection conditions. The disease index (DI), Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDKs) and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination were evaluated. The stability of the fungicides was also evaluated based on 10 epidemic conditions. The organic fungicides showed much lower efficacy than the conventional ones, although significant reductions in symptoms and DON contamination were observed. In each group, significant variability was detected. The best fungicides for DON contamination showed the lowest variance (highest stability) between 10 and 20 (Verben, Prosaro, Ascra Xpro). The organic fungicides were much less stable; the least stable showed a variance of 141 (Fusarium control: 264). The best organic fungicide was the Bordeaux mixture supported by sulfur addition (variance: 54). The DI and FDK values presented very similar trends. For the more resistant cultivar GK Pilis, the combined DON reduction exceeded 90% for all fungicides. For the most susceptible cultivar, GK Békés, the values were between 30 and 83%, respectively. High resistance to FHB and toxin contamination is the key to controlling FHB in both organic and conventional production. For efficient fungicide control, stable resistance to disease and toxin accumulation are equally required. Principal component analysis (PCA) verified the importance of considering all traits to identify the fungicidal “fingerprint” and demonstrated the differences between fungicides regardless of their organic or conventional nature. PC response differs for traits and fungicides, supporting the complex evaluation of plant and fungicide behavior. Knowledge of resistance levels, in addition to improving mycotoxin control, aids in disease forecasting and epidemic management. The results are applicable to both organic and conventional production systems. Due to the variability in resistance and fungicidal effects, there is an opportunity to improve food safety in both organic and conventional wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fungicides had much lower efficacy than conventional fungicides.

Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
much lowere0
Comparator
the conventional onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic fungicides showed much lower efficacy than the conventional ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fungicides significantly reduced symptoms and DON contamination.

Treatment
organic fungicidese1
Outcome
symptoms and DON contaminatione0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant reductions in symptoms and DON contamination were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“The organic fungicides showed much lower efficacy than the conventional ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides varied significantly within both organic and conventional groups.

Outcome
variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“In each group, significant variability was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best fungicides for DON contamination had variance between 10 and 20.

Treatment
Verben, Prosaro, Ascra Xproe0
Outcome
variancee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
between 10 and 20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best fungicides for DON contamination showed the lowest variance (highest stability) between 10 and 20 (Verben, Prosaro, Ascra Xpro)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least stable organic fungicide had variance of 141.

Outcome
variancee0
Direction
least stablee0
Value
141e0
Qualifier
Fusarium control: 264e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic fungicides were much less stable; the least stable showed a variance of 141 (Fusarium control: 264)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture with sulfur was the best organic fungicide, with variance 54.

Treatment
Bordeaux mixture supported by sulfur additione0
Outcome
variancee0
Direction
beste0
Value
54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best organic fungicide was the Bordeaux mixture supported by sulfur addition (variance: 54)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI and FDK showed similar trends.

Outcome
DI and FDK valuese0
Direction
very similar trendse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DI and FDK values presented very similar trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined DON reduction exceeded 90% for all fungicides in GK Pilis.

Material
GK Pilise0
Treatment
all fungicidese0
Outcome
DON reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
exceeded 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the more resistant cultivar GK Pilis, the combined DON reduction exceeded 90% for all fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined DON reduction in GK Békés was between 30 and 83%.

Material
GK Békése0
Outcome
valuese0
Value
between 30 and 83%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the most susceptible cultivar, GK Békés, the values were between 30 and 83%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1652 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA distinguished fungicides and showed the importance of considering all traits.

Outcome
differences between fungicidese0
Comparator
organic or conventional naturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Principal component analysis (PCA) verified the importance of considering all traits to identify the fungicidal “fingerprint” and demonstrated the differences between fungicides regardless of their organic or conventional nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC response differed by traits and fungicides.

Outcome
PC responsee0
Direction
differse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“PC response differs for traits and fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stable resistance to disease and toxin accumulation is required for efficient fungicide control.

Outcome
stable resistance to disease and toxin accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“For efficient fungicide control, stable resistance to disease and toxin accumulation are equally required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1881 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.