Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Efficacy of Biological Control and Cultivar Resistance on Fusarium Head Blight and T-2 Toxin Contamination in Wheat

Scholastica Leah Musyimi; James Wanjohi Muthomi; Rama Devi Narla; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Laboratory and green house experiments were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides, biological agents and host resistance in managing FHB and the associated T-2 toxin. In vitro activity of fungicides and antagonists was determined by paired culture method. Effect of microbial agents on FHB severity and mycotoxin content was determined by co-inoculating F. graminearum and F. poae with Alternaria spp., Epicoccum spp. and Trichoderma spp. Fungicides Pearl? (500 g/L carbendazim), Cotaf? (50 g/L hexaconacole), Thiovit? (micronised sulphur 80% w/w) and Folicur? (430 g/L tebuconazole) were the standard checks. Host resistance was determined by inoculating F. poae and F. graminearum to four wheat cultivars and fifteen lines in pot ex-periments. Fungicides resulted in 100% inhibition of pathogen radial growth in in vitro while microbial agents suppressed pathogen growth by up to 53%. Thiovit? and Trichoderma were the most effective in reducing FHB severity in green house pot experiments. The wheat cultivars and lines varied in susceptibility with cultivar Njoro BW II showing least susceptibility while line R1104, cv. Mbuni and cv. KIBIS were most susceptible. All the wheat cultivars and lines accumulated T-2 toxin by up to 5 to 28 μg/kg. The results indicated that neither fungicides nor antagonists can solely be relied on in managing FHB and toxin accumulation. Therefore, integration of biocontrol agents, fungicides and further breeding efforts to improve lines and cultivars with promising resistance to FHB and T2-toxin contamina-tion is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides inhibit radial growth of the wheat Fusarium head blight pathogen by 100% in vitro.

Treatment
Fungicidese0
Outcome
pathogen radial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
100%e0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicides resulted in 100% inhibition of pathogen radial growth in in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial agents suppressed pathogen growth in wheat Fusarium head blight trials by up to 53%.

Treatment
microbial agentse1
Outcome
pathogen growthe1
Direction
suppressede1
Value
up to 53%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“microbial agents suppressed pathogen growth by up to 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiofungicide Thiovit? was among the most effective treatments in reducing FHB severity in wheat in greenhouse pot experiments.

Treatment
Thiovit?e2
Outcome
FHB severitye2
Direction
reducinge2
Setting
green house pot experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Thiovit? and Trichoderma were the most effective in reducing FHB severity in green house pot experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma was among the most effective treatments in reducing FHB severity in wheat in greenhouse pot experiments.

Treatment
Trichodermae2
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
FHB severitye2
Direction
reducinge2
Setting
green house pot experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Thiovit? and Trichoderma were the most effective in reducing FHB severity in green house pot experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1004 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivar Njoro BW II showed least susceptibility among the tested wheat cultivars and lines.

Material
cultivar Njoro BW IIe3
Outcome
susceptibilitye3
Direction
leaste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The wheat cultivars and lines varied in susceptibility with cultivar Njoro BW II showing least susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat line R1104 was most susceptible among the tested wheat cultivars and lines.

Material
line R1104e4
Outcome
susceptibilitye3
Direction
moste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The wheat cultivars and lines varied in susceptibility with cultivar Njoro BW II showing least susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1115 · show in text ↑
e4

“line R1104, cv. Mbuni and cv. KIBIS were most susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1179 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivar Mbuni was most susceptible among the tested wheat cultivars and lines.

Material
cv. Mbunie4
Outcome
susceptibilitye3
Direction
moste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The wheat cultivars and lines varied in susceptibility with cultivar Njoro BW II showing least susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1115 · show in text ↑
e4

“line R1104, cv. Mbuni and cv. KIBIS were most susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1179 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivar KIBIS was most susceptible among the tested wheat cultivars and lines.

Material
cv. KIBISe4
Outcome
susceptibilitye3
Direction
moste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The wheat cultivars and lines varied in susceptibility with cultivar Njoro BW II showing least susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1115 · show in text ↑
e4

“line R1104, cv. Mbuni and cv. KIBIS were most susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested wheat cultivars and lines accumulated T-2 toxin, up to 5 to 28 μg/kg.

Outcome
T-2 toxine5
Value
5 to 28 μg/kge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All the wheat cultivars and lines accumulated T-2 toxin by up to 5 to 28 μg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1259 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Neither fungicides nor antagonists can be relied on alone for managing wheat FHB and toxin accumulation.

Outcome
managing FHB and toxin accumulatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“neither fungicides nor antagonists can solely be relied on in managing FHB and toxin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1385 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of biocontrol agents, fungicides and further breeding efforts is recommended for wheat FHB and T-2 toxin contamination.

Outcome
integration of biocontrol agents, fungicides and further breeding effortse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“integration of biocontrol agents, fungicides and further breeding efforts to improve lines and cultivars with promising resistance to FHB and T2-toxin contamina-tion is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1578 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.