Paper · 2026 · PLoS ONE

Yield and combining ability of temperate ex-PVP introgressed and tropical maize under contrasting moisture regimes

Isaiah Aleri; Manje Gowda; Andrew Chavangi; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Low grain yield and recurrent drought remain major constraints to maize production in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), underscoring the urgent need for hybrids with improved resilience. The use of ex-PVP (expired Plant Variety Protection) temperate maize lines is important to improve yield potential and genetic diversity in tropical adapted lines. In this study, 15 temperate introgressed lines and 6 tropical lines were crossed with eight single cross testers to generate 168 testcross hybrids. All genotypes were evaluated in 8 sites, with 6 well-watered (WW) and 2 drought-stressed (DS) conditions in Kenya. Analysis showed significant genotypic and site effects for grain yield (GY) and other agronomic traits, with strong genotype × environment interactions under drought. General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were important, with additive variance dominating under both WW and DS. Temperate introgression (TI) improved yield performance in most tropical backgrounds, with hybrids from TI outperforming tropical hybrids by 1.20-2.04 t/ha under optimal conditions and yielding similarly under drought stress (TI, 1.88 t/ha; tropical, 1.89 t/ha). Hybrids showed up to 74% reduction in GY, 22% lower PH, 18% lower EH, and a 72% increase in ASI under DS compared to WW. Lines L2, L10, L16 and testers T1, T2, T3, T4, T7 showed consistently positive GCA for GY and shorter anthesis-silking interval, suggesting they can be used in breeding programs to develop high yielding drought tolerant hybrids suitable for sub-Saharan Africa. These findings emphasize the value of ex-PVP lines as source to enhance yield in tropical adapted germplasm. Both additive and non-additive gene action are important, combining pedigree methods with genomic selection for additive effects along with strategic heterosis use can accelerate the development of high-yielding, climate-resilient maize hybrids for stress-prone regions of SSA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield and agronomic traits had significant genotypic and site effects.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
genotypic and site effects for grain yield (GY) and other agronomic traitse0
Setting
sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis showed significant genotypic and site effects for grain yield (GY) and other agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interactions were strong under drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
genotype × environment interactionse0
Qualifier
under droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong genotype × environment interactions under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive variance dominated combining ability under well-watered and drought conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
additive variance dominatinge0
Qualifier
under both WW and DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) were important, with additive variance dominating under both WW and DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperate introgression improved yield in most tropical backgrounds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Temperate introgression (TI)e0
Outcome
yield performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in most tropical backgroundse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperate introgression (TI) improved yield performance in most tropical backgrounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperate introgressed hybrids yielded 1.20-2.04 t/ha more than tropical hybrids under optimal conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hybrids from TIe0
Outcome
outperforming tropical hybridse0
Direction
outperforminge0
Value
1.20-2.04 t/hae0
Qualifier
under optimal conditionse0
Comparator
tropical hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrids from TI outperforming tropical hybrids by 1.20-2.04 t/ha under optimal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperate introgressed and tropical hybrids yielded similarly under drought, at 1.88 and 1.89 t/ha respectively.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
TIe0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
similarlye0
Value
1.88 t/hae0
Qualifier
tropical, 1.89 t/hae0
Comparator
tropicale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yielding similarly under drought stress (TI, 1.88 t/ha; tropical, 1.89 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced hybrid grain yield by up to 74% relative to well-watered conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 74%e0
Comparator
WWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids showed up to 74% reduction in GY, 22% lower PH, 18% lower EH, and a 72% increase in ASI under DS compared to WW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered hybrid plant height by 22%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
PHe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
WWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids showed up to 74% reduction in GY, 22% lower PH, 18% lower EH, and a 72% increase in ASI under DS compared to WW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered hybrid ear height by 18%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
EHe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
WWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids showed up to 74% reduction in GY, 22% lower PH, 18% lower EH, and a 72% increase in ASI under DS compared to WW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased anthesis-silking interval by 72%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
ASIe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
72%e0
Comparator
WWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids showed up to 74% reduction in GY, 22% lower PH, 18% lower EH, and a 72% increase in ASI under DS compared to WW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lines L2, L10 and L16 showed consistently positive general combining ability for yield and shorter anthesis-silking interval.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Lines L2, L10, L16e0
Outcome
positive GCA for GY and shorter anthesis-silking intervale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lines L2, L10, L16 and testers T1, T2, T3, T4, T7 showed consistently positive GCA for GY and shorter anthesis-silking interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Testers T1, T2, T3, T4 and T7 showed consistently positive general combining ability for yield and shorter anthesis-silking interval.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
testers T1, T2, T3, T4, T7e0
Outcome
positive GCA for GY and shorter anthesis-silking intervale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lines L2, L10, L16 and testers T1, T2, T3, T4, T7 showed consistently positive GCA for GY and shorter anthesis-silking interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the selected lines and testers for breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
used in breeding programs to develop high yielding drought tolerant hybridse0
Setting
sub-Saharan Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting they can be used in breeding programs to develop high yielding drought tolerant hybrids suitable for sub-Saharan Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose combining pedigree methods, genomic selection and heterosis use to accelerate resilient maize hybrid development.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
combining pedigree methods with genomic selection for additive effects along with strategic heterosis usee0
Setting
stress-prone regions of SSAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining pedigree methods with genomic selection for additive effects along with strategic heterosis use can accelerate the development of high-yielding, climate-resilient maize hybrids for stress-prone regions of SSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

drought · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.