Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

A synthetic Bacillus compound agent enhances cotton yield and fiber quality by regulating rhizosphere microbes and metabolites

Qingpeng Wang; Chengcai Yan; Qingyun Liu; et al.

19
claims
51
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To improve cotton yield and reduce reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, we synthesized a novel compound microbial agent with cotton growth-promoting activity. Pot experiments demonstrated that application of this agent significantly promoted cotton seedling growth: chlorophyll content increased by 6.6%, root activity was enhanced by 87.69%, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content decreased by 44.36%. Furthermore, the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively. Field plot trials showed that the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%–24.34% and improved fiber quality, with the spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength, and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48%, and 3.06%, respectively. Further analyses of nutrient contents in cotton leaves, rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, amplicon sequencing, and untargeted metabolomics revealed that, compared with the control group: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24%, and 37.76%, respectively; rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%, while available phosphorus (AP), organic matter (OM), and total phosphorus (TP) increased by 33.43%, 17.40%, and 73.26%, respectively; bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%, whereas the Shannon index increased by 0.29%; fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. At the genus level, the relative abundances of Iamia , Polycyclovorans , Arenimonas , and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27%, and 67.58%, respectively, whereas those of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Moreover, the secondary metabolite composition in rhizosphere soil was altered: terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents increased, while phenol content decreased, with significant accumulation of tryptamine, L-tryptophan, and serotonin. This study confirms that the novel compound microbial agent enhances cotton yield and fiber quality via synergistic mechanisms, providing effective technical support for the development of green cotton production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content increased by 6.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
87.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root activity was enhanced by 87.69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
44.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (MDA) content decreased by 44.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%.

Treatment
the agent treatmente0
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
136.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%.

Treatment
the agent treatmente0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
125.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%.

Treatment
the agent treatmente0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
45.73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%.

Treatment
the agente0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.00%–24.34%e0
Setting
Field plot trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field plot trials showed that the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%–24.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively.

Treatment
the agente0
Outcome
spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength, and elongatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.35%, 7.48%, and 3.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%–24.34% and improved fiber quality, with the spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength, and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48%, and 3.06%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively.

Organ / stage
cotton leavese0
Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.27%, 68.24%, and 37.76%e0
Comparator
the control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the control group: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24%, and 37.76%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1222 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
rhizosphere soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.78%e0
Comparator
the control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
available phosphorus (AP), organic matter (OM), and total phosphorus (TP)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.43%, 17.40%, and 73.26%e0
Comparator
the control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus (AP), organic matter (OM), and total phosphorus (TP) increased by 33.43%, 17.40%, and 73.26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1397 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
bacterial community Chao1 indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
7.93%e0
Comparator
the control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
Shannon indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.29%e0
Qualifier
bacterial communitye0
Comparator
the control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%, whereas the Shannon index increased by 0.29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1495 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indicese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.54% and 1.07%e0
Comparator
the control groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1583 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
relative abundances of Iamia , Polycyclovorans , Arenimonas , and Verticilliume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27%, and 67.58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative abundances of Iamia , Polycyclovorans , Arenimonas , and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27%, and 67.58%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1749 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
those of Bacillus and Fusariume0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
35.37% and 21.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas those of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the secondary metabolite composition in rhizosphere soil was altered: terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
phenol contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents increased, while phenol content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2009 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil.

Treatment
Bacillus compound agentt1
Outcome
accumulation of tryptamine, L-tryptophan, and serotonine0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with significant accumulation of tryptamine, L-tryptophan, and serotonin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2083 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus compound agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 · show in text ↑