Paper · 2024 · Mezhdunarodnyi sel skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal

The influence of the irrigation and fertilizer regime on the quality of winter wheat grain in the conditions of the Tersk-Sulak lowland of Dagestan

Nurulislan Magomedov; Alisalam Abdullayev; Zamiddin Abdullayev; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 2017-2020, we conducted research to identify the most rational irrigation regimes and the effect of mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of new varieties of winter wheat (Bezostaya 100). The field experiments were conducted on the meadow-chestnut heavy loamy soil of the Kirov Experimental Station, a branch of the Federal Agricultural Research Center of the Republic of Dagestan. In 2017, in the first department of the experimental station, on the irrigated lands of the Tersko-Sulak Lowland in the grain-and-tillage crop rotation, the effect of the irrigation regime was studied: water-charging irrigation in furrows; water-charging irrigation + vegetative irrigation at a lower moisture threshold of 70% of the water-holding capacity; furrow irrigation and fertilization, on the chemical composition of the grain. These options were studied on two backgrounds: fertilized (N90 P120) and unfertilized. The best conditions for obtaining high yields and high-quality grain of winter wheat are created on average over three years of research, with moisture charging + vegetative irrigation when the lower threshold of soil moisture reaches 70% of the water-holding capacity on unfertilized (31.9 kg/ha) and on fertilized (38.0 kg/ha) soil. Compared to moisture charging irrigation in furrows (control). Where the yield was lower, respectively, without fertilizers by 2.2 c/ha, with fertilizers (N90P120) – 8.3c/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture charging plus vegetative irrigation gave the best yield and grain quality on unfertilized soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
moisture charging + vegetative irrigatione0
Outcome
high yields and high-quality graine0
Direction
beste0
Value
31.9 kg/hae0
Comparator
unfertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best conditions for obtaining high yields and high-quality grain of winter wheat are created on average over three years of research, with moisture charging + vegetative irrigation when the lower threshold of soil moisture reaches 70% of the water-holding capacity on unfertilized (31.9 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On fertilized soil the same irrigation regime yielded 38.0 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigationt0
Outcome
yieldse2
Value
38.0 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on fertilized (38.0 kg/ha) soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigation and fertilizer regime on the quality of winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The best conditions for obtaining high yields and high-quality grain of winter wheat are created on average over three years of research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to combined irrigation, furrow moisture charging reduced yield by 2.2 c/ha without fertilizer.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
moisture charging irrigation in furrowse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.2 c/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to moisture charging irrigation in furrows (control). Where the yield was lower, respectively, without fertilizers by 2.2 c/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to combined irrigation, furrow moisture charging reduced yield by 8.3c/ha with fertilizer.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigationt0
Outcome
yieldse2
Value
8.3c/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with fertilizers (N90P120) – 8.3c/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigation and fertilizer regime on the quality of winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The best conditions for obtaining high yields and high-quality grain of winter wheat are created on average over three years of research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.