Paper · 2026 · Natural Product Research

Bioactive profiling of four Sphagnum species: phytochemicals, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic effects

Tülay Aşkın Çelik; Özlem Sultan Aslantürk; Esin Poyrazoğlu Çoban; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bryophytes have attracted increasing interest due to their unique repertoire of bioactive compounds. This study evaluated the phytochemical composition and biological activities of methanolic extracts obtained from four Sphagnum taxa (Sphagnum compactum, Sphagnum teres, Sphagnum subsecundum and Sphagnum nemoreum). Preliminary phytochemical screening indicated the presence of phenolic compounds, while alkaloids were not detected. Subsequent LC–MS/MS analysis enabled the identification of several phenolic constituents, including myricetin, quercetin, cinnamic acid, rutin, gallic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid and ascorbic acid. Antimicrobial assays demonstrated that S. teres and S. compactum exhibited the strongest activity, particularly against Corynebacterium xerosis, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus cereus and Candida utilis, whereas the remaining taxa showed moderate to low antimicrobial effects, mainly against Gram-positive bacteria. Antioxidant capacity, assessed using DPPH and phosphomolybdate assays, was notable and dose-dependent, while comparatively lower activity was observed in the CUPRAC assay. Cytotoxicity evaluations performed on MKN-28 human gastric cancer cells and normal human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) cells revealed no significant toxic effects at the tested concentrations. Overall, Sphagnum extracts demonstrated selective antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, supporting their potential relevance for future pharmaceutical and industrial applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic compounds were present in the Sphagnum extracts.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
presence of phenolic compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary phytochemical screening indicated the presence of phenolic compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaloids were not detected in Sphagnum extracts.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
alkaloids were not detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alkaloids were not detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LC–MS/MS identified myricetin, quercetin and cinnamic acid in the extracts.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
myricetin, quercetin, cinnamic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identification of several phenolic constituents, including myricetin, quercetin, cinnamic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LC–MS/MS identified rutin, gallic acid and caffeic acid.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
rutin, gallic acid, caffeic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rutin, gallic acid, caffeic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LC–MS/MS identified chlorogenic acid and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
chlorogenic acid and ascorbic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorogenic acid and ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. teres showed strong antimicrobial activity, particularly against the named test organisms.

Taxon
S. teresSphagnum terese0
Interactor
Corynebacterium xerosisCorynebacterium xerosise0other
Outcome
strongest activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum teres
Sphagnum teres · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 15:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Corynebacterium xerosis
Corynebacterium xerosis · InteractorWen F, Xing X, Bao S, Hu Y, Hao BC · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. teres and S. compactum exhibited the strongest activity, particularly against Corynebacterium xerosis, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus cereus and Candida utilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. compactum showed strong antimicrobial activity.

Taxon
S. compactumSphagnum compactume0
Outcome
strongest activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum compactum
Sphagnum compactum · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. teres and S. compactum exhibited the strongest activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–737 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining Sphagnum taxa had moderate to low antimicrobial effects.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
moderate to low antimicrobial effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remaining taxa showed moderate to low antimicrobial effects, mainly against Gram-positive bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant capacity was notable and dose-dependent by DPPH and phosphomolybdate assays.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Treatment
dose-dependente0
Outcome
Antioxidant capacitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant capacity, assessed using DPPH and phosphomolybdate assays, was notable and dose-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CUPRAC assay showed comparatively lower antioxidant activity.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparatively lower activity was observed in the CUPRAC assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts had no significant toxic effects in the tested human cell lines.

Taxon
SphagnumSphagnumt0
Outcome
toxic effectse0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphagnum
Sphagnum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant toxic effects at the tested concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sphagnum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 · show in text ↑