Paper · 2026 · Acta Horticulturae

Could the plum cultivar ‘Nada’ achieve the global importance seen in earlier cultivars from the Fruit Research Institute, Č a č ak?

N. Milošević; I. Glišić; M. Đorđević; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.) breeding program at the Fruit Research Institute, Čačak began in the early 1950s, shortly after the establishment of the Institute in 1946. The primary impetus for initiating plum breeding efforts was the rapid decline of the cultivar ‘Požegača’, prevalent in Serbia during that period, attributed to the emergence of the Sharka virus. The aim was to develop a new cultivar that would be qualitatively similar to ‘Požegača’ while simultaneously exhibiting tolerance to this virus. Although a new cultivar closely resembling ‘Požegača’ was not achieved, several cultivars were developed, becoming pivotal in plum production for subsequent decades in southeastern and central European countries. Notably, cultivars such as ‘Čačanska Lepotica’, ‘Čačanska Rodna’, ‘Čačanska Najbolja’ and ‘Čačanska Rana’ became essential for establishing new orchards and were widely employed as parent cultivars in numerous plum breeding programmes. In an attempt to preserve the acquired legacy, despite significantly diminished resources in the 1990s and early 2000s, the plum breeding efforts persisted. As a result, seven new cultivars were developed, with the cultivar ‘Nada’ standing out for its distinctive characteristics. Subsequently, there was a sustained increase in interest among producers in Serbia for cultivating this cultivar. During the seven-year period (2017-2023), we compared the cultivar ‘Nada’ with ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ and ‘Stanley’, considered the most important cultivars in Serbia, focusing on their key productive characteristics. On average, ‘Nada’ exhibited a larger fruit weight and superior fruit physical characteristics compared to the control cultivars. Additionally, this cultivar displayed intermediate tree vigour, but also the lowest yield among the examined cultivars. Concerning the chemical properties of the fruit, ‘Nada’ generally demonstrated intermediate values, typically surpassing those of ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ and falling short of ‘Stanley’, as expected due to the sequence of ripening time of the observed cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average over 2017-2023, plum cultivar Nada had a larger fruit weight than the control cultivars Čačanska Lepotica and Stanley.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Material
Nadae1
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
control cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, ‘Nada’ exhibited a larger fruit weight and superior fruit physical characteristics compared to the control cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, plum cultivar Nada had superior fruit physical characteristics compared with the control cultivars.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Material
Nadae1
Outcome
fruit physical characteristicse1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
control cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, ‘Nada’ exhibited a larger fruit weight and superior fruit physical characteristics compared to the control cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nada displayed intermediate tree vigour among the examined cultivars.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Outcome
tree vigoure1
Direction
intermediatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“this cultivar displayed intermediate tree vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nada had the lowest yield among the examined cultivars.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
examined cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest yield among the examined cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For fruit chemical properties, Nada generally had intermediate values, typically above Čačanska Lepotica and below Stanley.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticae0
Material
Nadae1
Outcome
chemical properties of the fruite1
Direction
intermediatee1
Qualifier
falling short of ‘Stanley’e1
Comparator
Čačanska Lepoticae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The domestic plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the chemical properties of the fruit, ‘Nada’ generally demonstrated intermediate values, typically surpassing those of ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ and falling short of ‘Stanley’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–2010 · show in text ↑