Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Sustainable nitrogen optimization in mung bean production: evaluating nitrogen-fixing bacteria and nitrogen dosages for yield and soil health

Ayesha Zahoor; Muhammad Asim; Uzair Ahmed; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inefficient nitrogen use limits sustainable mung bean (Vigna radiata) production, particularly in Vertisol systems with high clay content. Therefore, a two-year (2022–2023) factorial randomized complete block study was conducted on a Typic Haplusterts (clay loam) soil to evaluate three commercial nitrogen-fixing biofertilizers (Katyayani, Reclaimer, Bio & Bio) and four nitrogen rates (0, 30, 60, 90 kg ha−1) using the mung bean variety Swat Mung. Rhizobium inoculation combined with 60 kg N ha−1 significantly increased branch number (22.9%), plant height (15.3%), pods plant−1 (7.1%), seeds pod−1 (24.6%), 1000-seed weight (7.2%), seed protein (15.7%), seed yield (22.2%), and biomass (12.4%) relative to the uninoculated 0 N control. Although 90 kg N ha−1 increased post-harvest soil total N and organic matter, Bio & Bio + 60 kg N ha−1 achieved comparable productivity while producing the highest net return and benefit–cost ratio. Bio & Bio and higher N rates reduced soil pH and bulk density relative to the control. These findings identify 60 kg N ha−1 as an agronomically and economically optimal nitrogen threshold for Swat Mung grown on Typic Haplusterts, demonstrating that integrated biofertilizer use can reduce N input by approximately 33% without compromising yield while improving selected soil health indicators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation with 60 kg N ha−1 increased branch number by 22.9% relative to uninoculated zero N.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation combined with 60 kg N ha−1e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
branch numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.9%e0
Comparator
uninoculated 0 N controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation combined with 60 kg N ha−1 significantly increased branch number (22.9%), plant height (15.3%), pods plant−1 (7.1%), seeds pod−1 (24.6%), 1000-seed weight (7.2%), seed protein (15.7%), seed yield (22.2%), and biomass (12.4%) relative to the uninoculated 0 N control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium with 60 kg N ha−1 increased plant height by 15.3%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation combined with 60 kg N ha−1e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.3%e0
Comparator
uninoculated 0 N controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation combined with 60 kg N ha−1 significantly increased branch number (22.9%), plant height (15.3%), pods plant−1 (7.1%), seeds pod−1 (24.6%), 1000-seed weight (7.2%), seed protein (15.7%), seed yield (22.2%), and biomass (12.4%) relative to the uninoculated 0 N control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.