Paper · 2026 · Ecology and Evolution

Land‐Use Effects on Melliferous Woody Flora in Sudanian Agroforestry Parkland and Protected Area of West Africa

Issaka Wendpanga Kanazoe; Issa Nombré; Adama Zoungrana; et al.

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Land‐use intensification alters vegetation structure and composition, with potential consequences for pollinator‐dependent ecosystems in tropical regions. However, the distribution and availability of melliferous woody flora across contrasting land use types in West Africa remain poorly studied. This study evaluated melliferous floristic composition and woody stand structure across sudanian agroforestry parkland (farmland and fallow land) and protected area in southwestern Burkina Faso. Ninety vegetation plots were surveyed, and flowering dynamics were monitored monthly over 1 year. A total of 48 melliferous woody species belonging to 16 families were recorded, dominated by Fabaceae, Combretaceae, and Sapotaceae. Species composition differed significantly among land use types. Fallow land and protected area supported the highest melliferous species richness, whereas farmland exhibited reduced richness and density but larger individual trees. Vitellaria paradoxa dominated all land use types. Indicator species analysis identified 19 significant melliferous species. Among these, Combretum glutinosum , Terminalia avicennioides , and Terminalia leiocarpa were the principal indicator species associated with both fallow land and protected area, whereas no species was identified as specific to farmland. Protected area maintained the highest melliferous tree densities and greater species evenness. Temporal patterns of flowering varied among land use types. The protected area ensured extended forage availability for a minimum of 3 months, with Mitragyna inermis notably flowering for up to 5 months. These results support integrated landscape management combining conservation of melliferous habitats with targeted enrichment of woody species to sustain pollination services and beekeeping productivity in West Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey recorded 48 woody melliferous species from 16 families.

Taxon
melliferous woody speciese0
Outcome
melliferous woody speciese0
Value
48e0
Qualifier
16 familiese0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 48 melliferous woody species belonging to 16 families were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fabaceae, Combretaceae and Sapotaceae dominated.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
dominated by Fabaceae, Combretaceae, and Sapotaceaee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“dominated by Fabaceae, Combretaceae, and Sapotaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species composition differed significantly among land-use types.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
Species compositione0
Direction
differede0
Setting
land use typese0

Verbatim

e0

“Species composition differed significantly among land use types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow land and protected area had the highest melliferous richness.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
melliferous species richnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Fallow land and protected areae0

Verbatim

e0

“Fallow land and protected area supported the highest melliferous species richness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmland had reduced richness and density.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
richness and densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
farmlande0

Verbatim

e0

“farmland exhibited reduced richness and density but larger individual trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmland had larger individual trees.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
individual treese0
Direction
largere0
Setting
farmlande0

Verbatim

e0

“farmland exhibited reduced richness and density but larger individual trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitellaria paradoxa dominated every land-use type.

Taxon
Vitellaria paradoxaVitellaria paradoxae0
Outcome
dominated all land use typese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitellaria paradoxa
Vitellaria paradoxa · TaxonMarco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitellaria paradoxa dominated all land use types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1014 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indicator analysis identified 19 significant melliferous species.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
significant melliferous speciese0
Value
19e0

Verbatim

e0

“Indicator species analysis identified 19 significant melliferous species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three named species indicated fallow land and protected area.

Taxon
Combretum glutinosum , Terminalia avicennioides , and Terminalia leiocarpaCombretum glutinosumTerminalia avicennioidesTerminalia leiocarpae0
Outcome
principal indicator speciese0
Setting
fallow land and protected areae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Combretum glutinosum
Combretum glutinosum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia leiocarpa
Terminalia leiocarpa · TaxoniNaturalist.org (Fuseini Mugisu Suhuyini) (Fuseini Mugisu Suhuyini) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combretum glutinosum , Terminalia avicennioides , and Terminalia leiocarpa were the principal indicator species associated with both fallow land and protected area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No indicator species was specific to farmland.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
no species was identified as specific to farmlande0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no species was identified as specific to farmland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected area had the highest tree density and greater evenness.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
melliferous tree densities and greater species evennesse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Protected areae0

Verbatim

e0

“Protected area maintained the highest melliferous tree densities and greater species evenness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering timing varied among land uses.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
Temporal patterns of floweringe0
Direction
variede0
Setting
land use typese0

Verbatim

e0

“Temporal patterns of flowering varied among land use types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected area supplied forage for at least three months.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
forage availabilitye0
Direction
extendede0
Value
a minimum of 3 monthse0
Setting
protected areae0

Verbatim

e0

“The protected area ensured extended forage availability for a minimum of 3 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mitragyna inermis flowered for up to five months.

Taxon
Mitragyna inermisMitragyna inermise0
Outcome
floweringe0
Value
up to 5 monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mitragyna inermis
Mitragyna inermis · TaxonMarco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mitragyna inermis notably flowering for up to 5 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1623 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conserving melliferous habitats and enriching woody species.

Taxon
melliferous woody florat0
Outcome
integrated landscape management combining conservation of melliferous habitats with targeted enrichment of woody speciese0
Setting
West Africae0

Verbatim

e0

“integrated landscape management combining conservation of melliferous habitats with targeted enrichment of woody species to sustain pollination services and beekeeping productivity in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melliferous Woody Flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑