Paper · 2026 · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant

First successful vitrification-based cryopreservation of in vitro shoot tips of Sycamore Maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.): Influence of explant size, hardening, and pre-culture

Vitalina Karfik; Andreas Meier-Dinkel; Traud Winkelmann

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the first reproducible vitrification-based cryopreservation protocol for shoot tips of sycamore maple ( Acer pseudoplatanus L.), a tree of high ecological and economic significance in Central Europe. By safeguarding genetically verified material, including rare wood traits, this work supports the integration of the species into long-term ex situ conservation programmes. We investigated the influence of explant size, hardening duration, daytime temperature during hardening, and pre-culture across four genotypes. The protocol involved 4 wk of cold hardening under short-day conditions, a pre-culture at low temperature, vitrification with a plant vitrification solution, storage in liquid nitrogen, rapid rewarming, and gradual recovery under controlled light. Explant size proved decisive: shoot tips of 1–2 mm in length regrew at substantially higher rates and developed more vigorous shoots than larger explants. Four weeks of hardening with daytime temperatures between 3 and 7°C followed by pre-culture at 5°C produced the most reliable outcomes. The most responsive genotype reached regrowth in up to 90% of the explants, and for the remaining three genotypes, 50–64% regrowth was achieved. Post-cryopreservation, multiplication factors were comparable to non-cryopreserved control. Hyperhydricity occurred in a genotype-dependent manner but remained low overall. Thus, the protocol enables cryopreservation of sycamore maple genotypes, ensuring both survival and propagation potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot tips of 1–2 mm regrew more and developed more vigorous shoots than larger explants.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Organ / stage
shoot tipse0
Treatment
1–2 mm in lengthe0
Outcome
regrew at substantially higher rates and developed more vigorous shootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
larger explantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot tips of 1–2 mm in length regrew at substantially higher rates and developed more vigorous shoots than larger explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four weeks of hardening at 3–7°C followed by 5°C pre-culture gave the most reliable outcomes.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Treatment
Four weeks of hardening with daytime temperatures between 3 and 7°C followed by pre-culture at 5°Ce0
Outcome
most reliable outcomese0
Direction
most reliablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four weeks of hardening with daytime temperatures between 3 and 7°C followed by pre-culture at 5°C produced the most reliable outcomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most responsive genotype reached up to 90% regrowth.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Material
most responsive genotypee0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Value
up to 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most responsive genotype reached regrowth in up to 90% of the explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining three genotypes reached 50–64% regrowth.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Material
remaining three genotypese0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Value
50–64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the remaining three genotypes, 50–64% regrowth was achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-cryopreservation multiplication was comparable to non-cryopreserved controls.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Treatment
Post-cryopreservatione0
Outcome
multiplication factorse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
non-cryopreserved controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-cryopreservation, multiplication factors were comparable to non-cryopreserved control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyperhydricity varied by genotype but remained low overall.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Outcome
Hyperhydricitye0
Qualifier
genotype-dependent manner but remained low overalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hyperhydricity occurred in a genotype-dependent manner but remained low overall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“sycamore maple”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The protocol enables cryopreservation with survival and propagation potential.

Taxon
sycamore mapleAcer pseudoplatanuse0
Outcome
cryopreservation of sycamore maple genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer pseudoplatanus
Acer pseudoplatanus · TaxonChristian Pirkl · CC BY-SA 3.0 at · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protocol enables cryopreservation of sycamore maple genotypes, ensuring both survival and propagation potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1524 · show in text ↑