Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Genetic analysis of biomass yield and related traits for hybrid cultivar development in the leafy vegetable Gynandropsis gynandra (L.) Briq.

Aristide Carlos Houdegbe; Enoch G. Achigan-Dako; E. O. Dêêdi Sogbohossou; et al.

16
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development. A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse for gene action, combining ability effects and heterosis value of the biomass yield and related traits. The evaluation was done across seven environments between 2019 and 2021 using an alpha lattice design with two replicates per environment. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed among and between hybrids and parents for all agronomic traits. Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass. Significant general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA) effects together with variance component analysis revealed that both additive and nonadditive gene action controlled biomass and related traits in the species with the predominance of additive gene action. The environment significantly interacted with genotype, GCA and SCA. Mid- and best-parent heterosis varied between − 51.7% and 192.1%. Specifically, only positive heterosis effects were observed for leaf area and total fresh biomass, with an average mid-parent heterosis greater than 50%. Parents with good GCA and crosses with high SCA and heterosis were identified. There were similar patterns of positive associations among plant height, stem diameter, leaf traits and plant biomass in both parents and hybrids. In contrast, there were significant changes from parents to hybrids in the association of harvest index and time to 50% flowering with biomass per plant and leaf traits on the one hand and between harvest index and dry matter content on the other hand. The study thus revealed that reciprocal recurrent selection would be a sound breeding strategy for G. gynandra improvement with the development of hybrid cultivars to exploit heterosis. These findings contribute to the potential of using G. gynandra to decipher the genetic mechanism underlying heterosis in orphan leafy vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had stem diameter 21.1% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
stem diametere3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
21.1%e3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had plant height 34.4% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
34.4%e3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had primary branch length 37.6% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
primary branch lengthe3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
37.6%e3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had leaf traits 17.5–50.9% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
leaf traitse3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
17.5–50.9%e3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had total fresh biomass 80.6% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
fresh biomasse3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
80.6%e3
Qualifier
totale3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had edible fresh biomass 54.7% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
fresh biomasse3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
54.7%e3
Qualifier
ediblee3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, stem diameter, leaf traits and plant biomass were positively associated in Gynandropsis gynandra parents and hybrids.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
parents and hybridse0
Outcome
associations among plant height, stem diameter, leaf traits and plant biomasse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were similar patterns of positive associations among plant height, stem diameter, leaf traits and plant biomass in both parents and hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1702 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The association of harvest index and time to 50% flowering with biomass per plant and leaf traits changed significantly from parents to hybrids.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
parents to hybridse0
Outcome
association of harvest index and time to 50% flowering with biomass per plant and leaf traitse0
Qualifier
significant changese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were significant changes from parents to hybrids in the association of harvest index and time to 50% flowering with biomass per plant and leaf traits on the one hand and between harvest index and dry matter content on the other hand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1955 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The association between harvest index and dry matter content changed from parents to hybrids in Gynandropsis gynandra.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
parents to hybridse0
Outcome
harvest index and dry matter contente0
Qualifier
significant changese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were significant changes from parents to hybrids in the association of harvest index and time to 50% flowering with biomass per plant and leaf traits on the one hand and between harvest index and dry matter content on the other hand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

General and specific combining ability effects were significant in Gynandropsis gynandra.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA) effectse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA) effects together with variance component analysis revealed that both additive and nonadditive gene action controlled biomass and related traits in the species with the predominance of additive gene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both additive and nonadditive gene action controlled biomass and related traits in Gynandropsis gynandra, with predominance of additive gene action.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
both additive and nonadditive gene action controlled biomass and related traitse4
Qualifier
predominance of additive gene actione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA) effects together with variance component analysis revealed that both additive and nonadditive gene action controlled biomass and related traits in the species with the predominance of additive gene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The environment significantly interacted with genotype, GCA and SCA in Gynandropsis gynandra.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
genotype, GCA and SCAe0
Qualifier
The environment significantly interactede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e0

“The environment significantly interacted with genotype, GCA and SCA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid- and best-parent heterosis in Gynandropsis gynandra varied between −51.7% and 192.1%.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
Mid- and best-parent heterosise5
Value
− 51.7% and 192.1%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mid- and best-parent heterosis varied between − 51.7% and 192.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only positive heterosis was observed for leaf area and total fresh biomass in Gynandropsis gynandra, with average mid-parent heterosis greater than 50%.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
leaf area and total fresh biomasse6
Value
greater than 50%e6
Qualifier
only positive heterosis effectse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e6

“only positive heterosis effects were observed for leaf area and total fresh biomass, with an average mid-parent heterosis greater than 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1476 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reciprocal recurrent selection is a sound breeding strategy for Gynandropsis gynandra hybrid cultivar development.

Taxon
G. gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae7
Outcome
reciprocal recurrent selectione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The study thus revealed that reciprocal recurrent selection would be a sound breeding strategy for G. gynandra improvement with the development of hybrid cultivars to exploit heterosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parents with good GCA and crosses with high SCA and heterosis were identified in Gynandropsis gynandra.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Outcome
crosses with high SCA and heterosise0
Qualifier
Parents with good GCAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 · show in text ↑
e0

“Parents with good GCA and crosses with high SCA and heterosis were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1555 · show in text ↑