Intervention effectmodel-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had primary branch length 37.6% higher than their parents.

A claim from Genetic analysis of biomass yield and related traits for hybrid cultivar development in the leafy vegetable Gynandropsis gynandra (L.) Briq. · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids of Gynandropsis gynandra had primary branch length 37.6% higher than their parents.

Taxon
Gynandropsis gynandraGynandropsis gynandrae1
Material
F1 hybridse2
Treatment
F1 hybridse2
Outcome
primary branch lengthe3
Direction
performed bettere3
Value
37.6%e3
Comparator
their parentse3
Setting
field and greenhousee2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gynandropsis gynandra
Gynandropsis gynandra · TaxonSosicles Ennius · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Quantitative genetic parameters associated with the inheritance of biomass yield and related traits were evaluated in Gynandropsis gynandra for selecting appropriate breeding methods for cultivar development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207
e2

“A total of 331 F1 hybrids generated from a North Carolina mating design II and their 39 parental lines were evaluated in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–354
e3

“Overall, hybrids performed better than their parents for stem diameter (21.1%), plant height (34.4%), primary branch length (37.6%), leaf traits (17.5–50.9%), total (80.6%) and edible (54.7%) fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–916

Title

Genetic analysis of biomass yield and related traits for hybrid cultivar development in the leafy vegetable Gynandropsis gynandra (L.) Briq.

Aristide Carlos Houdegbe; Enoch G. Achigan-Dako; E. O. Dêêdi Sogbohossou; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12870-026-08814-1

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-79e2dfc0ef1a5b5dd1fc67b6a9563c9500d5d1ddaf2efde6f2398e9c9020bffb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer