Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Responses and driving mechanisms of leaf functional traits of Betula platyphylla along an elevational gradient in the Niyang River Basin, southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Ngawang Norbu; Rong-fang Wang; Hui Zhang; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Variation in plant functional traits reflects environmental adaptation. Understanding how traits shift along elevational gradients can clarify mechanisms by which species respond to environmental change. Here, we used white birch (Betula platyphylla) in the Niyang River Basin (left bank of the Yarlung Tsangpo River, Xizang) as a model species to quantify leaf trait variation along an elevational gradient and to identify key environmental drivers. Leaf functional traits were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, redundancy analysis (RDA), Pearson correlation, and principal component analysis (PCA). Coefficients of variation ranged from 5.52% to 26.14%, with leaf area showing the greatest variation and leaf water content the lowest. Most traits differed significantly among elevations: leaf area (LA), leaf length (LL), leaf width (LW), petiole length (PL), petiole base width (PBW) and leaf phosphorus content (LPC) declined with increasing elevation, whereas leaf nitrogen content (LNC) and leaf N: P ratio increased. Total chlorophyll content (TChl) and leaf water content (LWC) exhibited a hump-shaped pattern along the elevational gradient. In contrast, leaf dry matter content (LDMC) exhibited a unimodal pattern along the elevational gradient, whereas specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf mass per area (LMA) showed no significant trends with elevation. RDA indicated that soil factors were the primary drivers of leaf trait variation, explaining 50.90% of the total variance; soil total nitrogen (TN), pH, and available potassium (AK) were the most influential variables. Trait patterns suggest contrasting resource acquisition strategies across elevations: high-elevation individuals enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and shifted toward a more acquisitive "fast investment-return" strategy to cope with harsher conditions. Our findings contribute to understanding the adaptive responses of montane tree species to climate warming and improve our understanding of plant trait variation along environmental gradients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf trait variation ranged from 5.52% to 26.14%.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
Coefficients of variatione0
Value
5.52% to 26.14%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coefficients of variation ranged from 5.52% to 26.14%, with leaf area showing the greatest variation and leaf water content the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–732 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, length, width, petiole length and base width declined with elevation.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
leaf area (LA), leaf length (LL), leaf width (LW), petiole length (PL), petiole base width (PBW)e0
Direction
declinede0
Setting
elevationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most traits differed significantly among elevations: leaf area (LA), leaf length (LL), leaf width (LW), petiole length (PL), petiole base width (PBW) and leaf phosphorus content (LPC) declined with increasing elevation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus declined with elevation.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
leaf phosphorus content (LPC)e0
Direction
declinede0
Setting
elevatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf phosphorus content (LPC) declined with increasing elevation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen and nitrogen to phosphorus ratio increased with elevation.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae2
Outcome
leaf nitrogen content (LNC) and leaf N: P ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
elevationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf nitrogen content (LNC) and leaf N: P ratio increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most traits differed significantly among elevations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll and water content followed hump-shaped elevation patterns.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
Total chlorophyll content (TChl) and leaf water content (LWC)e0
Direction
hump-shapede0
Setting
elevational gradiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content (TChl) and leaf water content (LWC) exhibited a hump-shaped pattern along the elevational gradient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry matter content followed a unimodal elevation pattern.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
leaf dry matter content (LDMC)e0
Direction
unimodale0
Setting
elevational gradiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf dry matter content (LDMC) exhibited a unimodal pattern along the elevational gradient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area and leaf mass per area showed no significant elevation trends.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf mass per area (LMA)e0
Direction
no significant trendse0
Setting
elevatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf mass per area (LMA) showed no significant trends with elevation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil factors explained 50.90% of leaf trait variance.

Taxon
white birchBetula pendulae1
Outcome
leaf trait variatione0
Value
50.90%e0
Setting
soil factorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil factors were the primary drivers of leaf trait variation, explaining 50.90% of the total variance; soil total nitrogen (TN), pH, and available potassium (AK) were the most influential variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1576 · show in text ↑
e1

“white birch (Betula platyphylla)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–250 · show in text ↑