Paper · 2026 · Plant Disease

First Report of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola causing Bacterial Canker Disease on grapevine in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Igor Alexsader Melo Pimentel; Keyla Walescka Lopes Silva; Rui Sales Júnior; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grapevine bacterial canker, caused by Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola (Xcv), is considered the most important bacterial disease of Vitis vinifera in tropical viticulture regions of Brazil (Lima et al. 2017). In the state of Rio Grande do Norte (RN), Northeast Brazil, grapevine production is expanding, demonstrating social and economic importance for small farmers, who produced approximately 125 tons of grapes in 2024 (IBGE, 2025). In August 2025, typical symptoms of bacterial canker, i.e., angular necrotic lesions on leaves and cankers on stems (Silva et al. 2020), were observed on 100% of the grapevines (cv. Vitória) in a 7 ha field located in the municipality of Apodi, RN state (05°36'24"S, 37°47'33"W). Samples were collected from a grapevine orchard, and five bacterial strains (CCRMXCV01 to CCRMXCV05) showing whitish, convex, mucoid colonies were isolated in petri dishes containing NYDA medium (Gama et al., 2011), which were incubated at 29°C for 48 h in the dark. The strains were stored at the Culture Collection Rosa Mariano (CCRM) of the Phytobacteriology Laboratory at the Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Pathogenicity tests were performed on grapevine seedlings (cv. Vitória), 60 days old. The strains were inoculated on the four apical grapevine leaves using a modified gauze-abrasion method (Lima et al. 2017). Briefly, sterile gauze was used to cause light abrasion on the leaf surface, which was sprayed using a bacterial suspension (1 × 10 8 CFU mL -1 ) supplemented with Tween 20 (0.05%) until runoff. The negative control consisted of leaves treated with sterile distilled water (SDW). One leaf was used per replicate, and four replicates were used per strain. Plants were maintained in a humid chamber 24h before and after inoculation, and incubated in the greenhouse, where the average temperature and relative humidity were 31.4ºC±2 and 65%±5, respectively. Inoculated leaves showed symptoms of necrotic lesions on leaves and cankers on veins 14 days after inoculation (DAI). Twenty-five DAI, we reisolated the pathogen and performed a BOX-PCR analysis according to Gama et al. (2018), with the strains inoculated and reisolated on NYDA medium to confirm the identity of the strains and to fulfill Koch’s postulates. At this time, leaves treated with SDW remained symptomless. The strains reisolated showed the same BOX profiles as the strains used for inoculations. The strains showed 100% of similarity and were observed to have five reproducible bands. The molecular identification was performed by sequencing the gyrB (DNA gyrase subunit B) and rpoD (RNA polymerase sigma factor 70) genes according to Young et al. (2008). Using the BLASTn tool, we observed that sequences of the rpoD (PX710105 to PX710109) and gyrB (PX711344 to PX711348) genes of the strains CCRMXCV01 to CCRMXCV05 showed 100% identity with sequences of these genes from the pathotype strain (LMG 965 T ) of Xcv. The phylogenetic analysis performed using Bayesian inference and the gyrB and rpoD concatenated sequence of all the type or representative strains of Xanthomonas spp. available in GenBank showed that the strains CCRMXCV01 to CCRMXCV05 clustered together with strain LMG 965 T , with 1.0 posterior probability. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Xcv causing grapevine bacterial canker in the RN state, Brazil. This finding shows the expansion of this pathogen to yet another Brazilian state, highlighting the importance of pathogen monitoring to prevent further spread to disease-free areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial canker symptoms occurred on all Vitória grapevines in the Apodi field.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Vitóriae0
Interactor
Xanthomonas citri pv. viticolaXanthomonas citri pv. viticolat0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms of bacterial cankere0
Value
100%e0
Setting
municipality of Apodi, RN statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“typical symptoms of bacterial canker, i.e., angular necrotic lesions on leaves and cankers on stems (Silva et al. 2020), were observed on 100% of the grapevines (cv. Vitória) in a 7 ha field located in the municipality of Apodi, RN state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola causing Bacterial Canker Disease on grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Vitória grapevine leaves developed necrotic lesions and vein cankers after 14 days.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
necrotic lesions on leaves and cankers on veinse0
Qualifier
14 days after inoculation (DAI)e0

Not reportedInteractorComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated leaves showed symptoms of necrotic lesions on leaves and cankers on veins 14 days after inoculation (DAI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2017 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-treated leaves remained symptomless.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
SDWe0
Outcome
symptomlesse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves treated with SDW remained symptomless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2317 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reisolated strains matched the inoculated strains by BOX profiles.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
same BOX profilese0
Comparator
strains used for inoculationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains reisolated showed the same BOX profiles as the strains used for inoculations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2408 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated strains showed complete similarity and five reproducible bands.

Taxon
Xanthomonas citri pv. viticolaXanthomonas citri pv. viticolat0
Outcome
similaritye0
Value
100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The strains showed 100% of similarity and were observed to have five reproducible bands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains showed complete rpoD and gyrB sequence identity to the pathotype strain.

Taxon
Xcve0
Gene
rpoDe0
Outcome
identitye0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
pathotype strain (LMG 965 T )e0

Verbatim

e0

“sequences of the rpoD (PX710105 to PX710109) and gyrB (PX711344 to PX711348) genes of the strains CCRMXCV01 to CCRMXCV05 showed 100% identity with sequences of these genes from the pathotype strain (LMG 965 T ) of Xcv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2709–2926 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated strains clustered with the Xcv pathotype strain with posterior probability 1.0.

Taxon
Xcve0
Outcome
clustered togethere0
Value
1.0 posterior probabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“strains CCRMXCV01 to CCRMXCV05 clustered together with strain LMG 965 T , with 1.0 posterior probability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3132–3236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify this as the first report of Xcv bacterial canker in Rio Grande do Norte.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Interactor
Xcve0pathogen
Outcome
first report of Xcv causing grapevine bacterial cankere0
Setting
RN state, Brazile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is the first report of Xcv causing grapevine bacterial canker in the RN state, Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3256–3346 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

67 papers: 19 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.