Paper · 2026 · Natural Product Research

GC-MS-based phytochemical profiling and antimicrobial activity against Vibrio cholera e of Ziziphus mucronata stem bark: implications for therapeutic use

Jerikias Marumure; Monde A. Nyila

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the phytochemical composition and antimicrobial properties of Ziziphus mucronata stem bark extracts. GC-MS analysis of the ethyl acetate extract identified fourteen detected compounds. The major validated constituents included 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (26.47%), 9-octadecenamide (Z) (23.71%), cis-vaccenic acid (13.07%), and n-hexadecanoic acid (9.23%). Antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Vibrio cholerae clinical isolates using the agar well diffusion method. The stembark extracts demonstrated notable antibacterial activity, exhibiting a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤ 1 mg/mL. In addition to the experimental assays, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to evaluate the biological activities of the validated compounds identified through GC-MS. Notably, these phytochemicals have been previously reported to possess significant antimicrobial properties. These preliminary findings support the traditional use of Ziziphus mucronata and suggest potential as an antimicrobial agent, warranting further investigation with broader spectrum testing and safety evaluation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethyl acetate extract analysis detected fourteen compounds.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatat0
Outcome
detected compoundse0
Value
fourteene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GC-MS analysis of the ethyl acetate extract identified fourteen detected compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus mucronata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5-hydroxymethylfurfural constituted 26.47% of the extract profile.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatat0
Outcome
5-hydroxymethylfurfurale0
Value
26.47%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major validated constituents included 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (26.47%), 9-octadecenamide (Z) (23.71%), cis-vaccenic acid (13.07%), and n-hexadecanoic acid (9.23%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus mucronata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

9-octadecenamide (Z) constituted 23.71% of the extract profile.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatat0
Outcome
9-octadecenamide (Z)e0
Value
23.71%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major validated constituents included 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (26.47%), 9-octadecenamide (Z) (23.71%), cis-vaccenic acid (13.07%), and n-hexadecanoic acid (9.23%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus mucronata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cis-vaccenic acid constituted 13.07% of the extract profile.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatat0
Outcome
cis-vaccenic acide0
Value
13.07%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major validated constituents included 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (26.47%), 9-octadecenamide (Z) (23.71%), cis-vaccenic acid (13.07%), and n-hexadecanoic acid (9.23%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus mucronata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

n-hexadecanoic acid constituted 9.23% of the extract profile.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatat0
Outcome
n-hexadecanoic acide0
Value
9.23%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major validated constituents included 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (26.47%), 9-octadecenamide (Z) (23.71%), cis-vaccenic acid (13.07%), and n-hexadecanoic acid (9.23%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ziziphus mucronata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem bark extracts had antibacterial activity against Vibrio cholerae with MIC ≤ 1 mg/mL.

Taxon
Vibrio choleraeVibrio choleraee0
Treatment
stembark extractse0
Outcome
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)e0
Value
≤ 1 mg/mLe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vibrio cholerae
Vibrio cholerae · TaxonTom Kirn, Ron Taylor, Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antimicrobial activity was evaluated against Vibrio cholerae clinical isolates using the agar well diffusion method. The stembark extracts demonstrated notable antibacterial activity, exhibiting a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤ 1 mg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–649 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend broader antimicrobial testing and safety evaluation.

Taxon
Ziziphus mucronataZiziphus mucronatae0
Outcome
broader spectrum testing and safety evaluatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus mucronata
Ziziphus mucronata · TaxonJMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These preliminary findings support the traditional use of Ziziphus mucronata and suggest potential as an antimicrobial agent, warranting further investigation with broader spectrum testing and safety evaluation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1149 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue