Paper · 2026 · Forest Science

Crop Tree Management Improved Growth and Crown Class Maintenance of Green Ash: 18-Year Results

A. E. Houston; W. K. Clatterbuck; J. L. Bowers

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A crop tree management study targeting green ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) was established in a 16-year-old, naturally regenerated, mixed-species, bottomland hardwood stand in southwest Tennessee. The goal was to maintain or improve ascendance of green ash into the overstory of a developing stand that otherwise might not occur. Three treatments were examined: a complete crown-touching release; the same release treatment along with a one-time, fertilizer application; and a control. Initial diameters, heights and crown size parameters were measured in 1996 and 18 years later. The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth response, but statistically outperformed the control treatment. Similarly, crown class scores did not differ between the two release treatments, but were significantly improved from the control. Both release treatments displayed a greater percentage of crop trees successfully competing for upper canopy status compared to the control. Using initial tree diameter as a reflection of crown size and position of crop trees, diameters of 12.5 to 20 cm were more likely to be a component of the overstory 18 years following crop tree treatments. Crop trees less than 12.5 cm in diameter were likely to remain in the subordinate crown classes. Trees greater than 20 cm in diameter were already in the overstory and maintained their upper canopy position. These results suggest that crop tree management can be an effective management tool for improving growth as well as improving overstory presence of green ash in pole-sized, mixed-species, bottomland hardwood stands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth.

Treatment
two release treatmentse0
Outcome
diameter and height growth responsee0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
two release treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth response, but statistically outperformed the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both release treatments outperformed control for diameter and height growth.

Treatment
two release treatmentse0
Outcome
diameter and height growth responsee0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth response, but statistically outperformed the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown class scores did not differ between release treatments.

Treatment
two release treatmentse0
Outcome
crown class scorese0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
two release treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crown class scores did not differ between the two release treatments, but were significantly improved from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Release treatments improved crown class scores versus control.

Treatment
two release treatmentse0
Outcome
crown class scorese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crown class scores did not differ between the two release treatments, but were significantly improved from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Release treatments increased the percentage of crop trees competing for upper canopy status.

Treatment
release treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of crop trees successfully competing for upper canopy statuse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both release treatments displayed a greater percentage of crop trees successfully competing for upper canopy status compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial diameters of 12.5 to 20 cm predicted overstory presence after 18 years.

Treatment
crop tree treatmentse0
Outcome
component of the overstorye0
Direction
more likelye0
Qualifier
diameters of 12.5 to 20 cme0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diameters of 12.5 to 20 cm were more likely to be a component of the overstory 18 years following crop tree treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees under 12.5 cm diameter were likely to stay in subordinate crown classes.

Outcome
subordinate crown classese0
Qualifier
less than 12.5 cm in diametere0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop trees less than 12.5 cm in diameter were likely to remain in the subordinate crown classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees over 20 cm diameter maintained upper canopy position.

Outcome
upper canopy positione0
Qualifier
greater than 20 cm in diametere0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees greater than 20 cm in diameter were already in the overstory and maintained their upper canopy position”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 · show in text ↑