Paper · 2026 · Forest Ecology and Management

Soils control biogeochemical shifts resulting from the conversion of native forest to pine plantations

Oscar Crovo; Alejandro Atenas; Pamela Castillo; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations in South-Central Chile, can substantially alter soil carbon (C) and nutrient cycling. We assessed the biogeochemical shifts resulting from this forest conversion by monitoring carbon and nutrient dynamics at 10 paired adult native forest and plantation sites across contrasting soil types (5 sites), including litterfall, LAI, fine root biomass, and soil CO₂ efflux, over a period of three years. In addition, we quantified aboveground tree biomass and total C, N, and P stocks in trees and soils. C inputs were significantly higher in native systems than in plantations (5.17 ± 1.19 vs. 3.19 ± 0.99 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively). Native forests also exhibited higher total C losses through soil CO₂ efflux (-3.19 ± 1.68 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) than pine plantations (-2.54 ± 1.52 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹), yet maintained a more favorable balance between inputs and losses, largely due to differences in the dominant C input pathways. Native forests showed greater fine-root production and deeper, denser rooting systems, whereas plantations were characterized by higher litterfall and faster decomposition rates, potentially accelerating carbon mineralization. Across soil types, native forests exhibited significantly higher aboveground biomass than adjacent plantations. Although aboveground carbon stocks tended to be higher in native forests, these differences were not statistically significant when all soil types were considered together. Nevertheless, native forests consistently allocated a greater proportion of carbon belowground, whereas plantations concentrated carbon inputs in aboveground compartments. Native forests also maintained larger soil and aboveground biomass N and P stocks than plantations. Responses varied systematically among soil types, with residual crystalline soils and older volcanic deposits showing higher carbon losses relative to inputs than younger volcanic ash-derived soils. Overall, our results demonstrate that soil parent material modulates post-conversion carbon fluxes and the distribution of ecosystem C, N, and P stocks, highlighting the importance of soil–vegetation interactions when evaluating carbon benefits and long-term sustainability of forest management strategies. • Plantations showed faster litter decomposition and carbon turnover than natural forests. • Fine-root production was consistently higher in native forests. • Soil parent material constrained the balance between carbon inputs and losses. • Soil type modulated post-conversion carbon fluxes and nutrient stocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon inputs were higher in native forests than in plantations (5.17 vs. 3.19 Mg C ha-1 year-1).

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
C inputse1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.17 ± 1.19 vs. 3.19 ± 0.99 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹e1
Comparator
plantationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“C inputs were significantly higher in native systems than in plantations (5.17 ± 1.19 vs. 3.19 ± 0.99 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–731 · show in text ↑
e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native forests had higher total C losses through soil CO2 efflux than pine plantations.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
total C lossese3
Direction
highere3
Value
-3.19 ± 1.68 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹e3
Comparator
pine plantationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Native forests also exhibited higher total C losses through soil CO₂ efflux (-3.19 ± 1.68 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) than pine plantations (-2.54 ± 1.52 Mg C ha⁻¹ year⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–894 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native forests maintained a more favorable balance between carbon inputs and losses, largely due to differences in the dominant C input pathways.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
balance between inputs and lossese4
Direction
more favorablee4
Qualifier
largely due to differences in the dominant C input pathwayse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“yet maintained a more favorable balance between inputs and losses, largely due to differences in the dominant C input pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native forests showed greater fine-root production.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
fine-root productione5
Direction
greatere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“Native forests showed greater fine-root production and deeper, denser rooting systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantations had higher litterfall than native forests.

Taxon
Pinus spp.Pinuse2
Outcome
litterfalle6
Direction
highere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“plantations were characterized by higher litterfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1170 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantations had faster decomposition rates, potentially accelerating carbon mineralization.

Taxon
Pinus spp.Pinuse2
Outcome
decomposition ratese7
Direction
fastere7
Qualifier
potentially accelerating carbon mineralizatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“faster decomposition rates, potentially accelerating carbon mineralization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across soil types, native forests had significantly higher aboveground biomass than adjacent plantations.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
aboveground biomasse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
adjacent plantationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Across soil types, native forests exhibited significantly higher aboveground biomass than adjacent plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground carbon stocks tended to be higher in native forests, but the difference was not statistically significant across all soil types.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
aboveground carbon stockse3
Direction
tended to be highere3
Qualifier
when all soil types were considered togethere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although aboveground carbon stocks tended to be higher in native forests, these differences were not statistically significant when all soil types were considered together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1534 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native forests allocated a greater proportion of carbon belowground, whereas plantations concentrated carbon inputs aboveground.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
proportion of carbon belowgrounde3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
whereas plantations concentrated carbon inputs in aboveground compartmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“native forests consistently allocated a greater proportion of carbon belowground, whereas plantations concentrated carbon inputs in aboveground compartments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native forests maintained larger soil and aboveground biomass N and P stocks than plantations.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
soil and aboveground biomass N and P stockse3
Direction
largere3
Comparator
plantationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Native forests also maintained larger soil and aboveground biomass N and P stocks than plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual crystalline soils and older volcanic deposits had higher carbon losses relative to inputs than younger volcanic ash-derived soils.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
carbon losses relative to inputse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
residual crystalline soils and older volcanic depositse3
Comparator
younger volcanic ash-derived soilse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“residual crystalline soils and older volcanic deposits showing higher carbon losses relative to inputs than younger volcanic ash-derived soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2005 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil parent material modulates post-conversion carbon fluxes.

Taxon
Nothofagus spp.Nothofaguse2
Outcome
post-conversion carbon fluxese3
Qualifier
soil parent material modulatese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nothofagus
Nothofagus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conversion from native temperate deciduous Nothofagus spp. forests to exotic Pinus spp. plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“soil parent material modulates post-conversion carbon fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2045–2105 · show in text ↑