Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

High-throughput phenotypic analysis of plant and curd growth dynamics during the whole growth period of cauliflower based on instance segmentation

Saichuan Cheng; Sidi Wu; Qingqing Shao; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficient phenotyping monitoring of cauliflower is crucial for its breeding and production. However, traditional manual measurement methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, and existing deep learning (DL) methods mostly focus on the seedling stage, lacking systematic research covering the entire growth period. In this study, RGB images of cauliflower from seedling to harvest were collected. Through systematic screening and evaluation of instance segmentation models, accurate segmentation of plants and curds was achieved, and plant canopy width, leaf area, and curd traits were automatically extracted to track their dynamic changes. Evaluation results showed that YOLO12s-seg was the optimal model. It can achieved a segmentation mask mAP 50 of 99.4% for plants and curds in sparsely planted images and showed an advantage in identifying partially occluded early curds beneath inner leaves. Traits such as plant canopy width and curd diameter automatically extracted from segmentation results were highly consistent with manual measurements (R 2 > 0.90). Furthermore, the Richards model and Sine model were used to accurately fit the growth dynamics of leaf area and curd area, respectively. Based on growth kinetics, curds were classified into three types: mature and compact type, peak-burst type, and steady-increase type. Cluster analysis of 47 germplasms based on high-throughput phenotyping data revealed four groups and their growth characteristics: comprehensively coordinated type, mid-maturity compact type, large high-yield type, and curd-dominant type. Integrating the above functions, a platform for cauliflower growth monitoring and phenotypic analysis was developed. It provided full-process support from automatic image processing to growth dynamic analysis. This work provides an effective automated solution for high-throughput phenotyping analysis and growth dynamic monitoring of cauliflower, and offers a referable analytical framework for crop growth pattern research and intelligent breeding decision-making.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLO12s-seg was the optimal instance segmentation model among those screened for cauliflower plants and curds.

Outcome
optimal modele0
Comparator
instance segmentation modelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Evaluation results showed that YOLO12s-seg was the optimal model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“systematic screening and evaluation of instance segmentation models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–476 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLO12s-seg achieved a segmentation mask mAP 50 of 99.4% for plants and curds in sparsely planted images.

Outcome
segmentation mask mAP 50e0
Value
99.4%e0
Setting
sparsely planted imagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“segmentation mask mAP 50 of 99.4% for plants and curds in sparsely planted images”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–811 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model showed an advantage in identifying partially occluded early curds beneath inner leaves.

Outcome
identifying partially occluded early curds beneath inner leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“showed an advantage in identifying partially occluded early curds beneath inner leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–902 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traits such as plant canopy width and curd diameter automatically extracted from segmentation were highly consistent with manual measurements (R2 > 0.90).

Outcome
plant canopy width and curd diametere0
Value
R 2 > 0.90e0
Comparator
manual measurementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Traits such as plant canopy width and curd diameter automatically extracted from segmentation results were highly consistent with manual measurements (R 2 > 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1066 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Richards model accurately fitted the growth dynamics of leaf area.

Outcome
growth dynamics of leaf areae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Richards model and Sine model were used to accurately fit the growth dynamics of leaf area and curd area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1203 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sine model accurately fitted the growth dynamics of curd area.

Outcome
growth dynamics of leaf area and curd areae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Richards model and Sine model were used to accurately fit the growth dynamics of leaf area and curd area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Based on growth kinetics, curds were classified into three types: mature and compact, peak-burst, and steady-increase.

Outcome
three typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“curds were classified into three types: mature and compact type, peak-burst type, and steady-increase type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1337 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis of 47 germplasms based on high-throughput phenotyping data revealed four groups with distinct growth characteristics.

Outcome
four groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cluster analysis of 47 germplasms based on high-throughput phenotyping data revealed four groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1435 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A platform for cauliflower growth monitoring and phenotypic analysis was developed, giving full-process support from automatic image processing to growth dynamic analysis.

Outcome
platform for cauliflower growth monitoring and phenotypic analysise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“a platform for cauliflower growth monitoring and phenotypic analysis was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1693 · show in text ↑