Abstract
Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure. Varieties differed significantly in stand establishment, biomass, nematode egg density, and lint yield. Nematicide application significantly reduced nematode egg density and increased plant biomass and lint yield. Several varieties, including PHY 357 W3FE and DP 2141NR B3XF, performed comparably to resistant standards, producing high yields despite nematode pressure. Results demonstrated a negative correlation between nematode density and lint yield, highlighting the value of integrating nematode-resistant varieties with nematicide use to optimize cotton productivity under reniform nematode pressure.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton varieties differed significantly in stand establishment, biomass and nematode egg density.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Interactor
- reniform nematodee0pathogen
- Outcome
- stand establishment, biomass, nematode egg densitye1
- Setting
- Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabamae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e1“Varieties differed significantly in stand establishment, biomass, nematode egg density, and lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton varieties differed significantly in lint yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Interactor
- reniform nematodee0pathogen
- Outcome
- lint yielde1
- Setting
- Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabamae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e1“Varieties differed significantly in stand establishment, biomass, nematode egg density, and lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematicide application significantly reduced nematode egg density in cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Nematicide applicatione2
- Interactor
- reniform nematodee0pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode egg densitye2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e2“Nematicide application significantly reduced nematode egg density and increased plant biomass and lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematicide application significantly increased plant biomass and lint yield in cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Nematicide applicatione2
- Outcome
- plant biomass and lint yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e2“Nematicide application significantly reduced nematode egg density and increased plant biomass and lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode density was negatively correlated with lint yield in cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Outcome
- lint yielde3
- Direction
- negative correlatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e3“Results demonstrated a negative correlation between nematode density and lint yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrating nematode-resistant varieties with nematicide use is valuable for optimizing cotton productivity under reniform nematode pressure.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume4
- Treatment
- integrating nematode-resistant varieties with nematicide usee4
- Outcome
- cotton productivitye4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“highlighting the value of integrating nematode-resistant varieties with nematicide use to optimize cotton productivity under reniform nematode pressure”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties PHY 357 W3FE and DP 2141NR B3XF performed comparably to resistant standards with high yields despite nematode pressure.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Material
- PHY 357 W3FE and DP 2141NR B3XFe5
- Outcome
- high yieldse5
- Qualifier
- despite nematode pressuree5
- Comparator
- resistant standardse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field trials conducted in 2025 at the Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in North Alabama evaluated 14 cotton varieties under moderate to high reniform nematode pressure”
e5“Several varieties, including PHY 357 W3FE and DP 2141NR B3XF, performed comparably to resistant standards, producing high yields despite nematode pressure”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.