Paper · 2026 · Smart Agricultural Technology

Execution-Aware NBV Planning via joint-space clustering for apple perception in orchard-like environments

Jinxing Niu; Chang Liu; Jie Yang; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In orchard-like apple perception scenarios, occlusion caused by leaves and branches often degrades apple localization, making Next-Best-View (NBV) planning important for reliable perception with eye-in-hand manipulators. However, due to joint limits, kinematic singularities, and joint-space discontinuities, an information-optimal viewpoint in task space does not necessarily correspond to a stable and efficient executable motion, revealing a mismatch between perceptual optimality and execution robustness. To bridge this gap, we propose a dual-layer NBV framework for apple perception under orchard-like occlusion conditions. Layer-1 generates task-oriented candidate viewpoints under geometric and visibility constraints in task space (i.e., SE(3)). Layer-2 maps these candidates into joint space and uses clustering as a practical grouping heuristic to organize sampled IK-feasible configurations. The grouped candidates are then evaluated using joint-space motion cost and conservative kinematic margins, with Predicted Surface Coverage (PSC) retained as a lightweight perception-side ranking signal in the downstream execution-aware evaluation. Experimental results show that, compared with an IK-filtered viewpoint-level baseline, the proposed L1+L2 pipeline improves planning success rate from 73.3% to 93.3%, reduces joint-space motion cost by approximately 40%, and increases joint-limit safety margins by about 28%, while maintaining comparable planning time. These results highlight the practical value of introducing a joint-space organizational layer for execution-aware NBV selection under controlled, static, single-target mock-orchard conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planner increased success rate from 73.3% to 93.3% versus the baseline.

Outcome
planning success ratee0
Direction
improvese0
Value
93.3%e0
Comparator
IK-filtered viewpoint-level baselinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with an IK-filtered viewpoint-level baseline, the proposed L1+L2 pipeline improves planning success rate from 73.3% to 93.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planner reduced joint-space motion cost by approximately 40%.

Outcome
joint-space motion coste0
Direction
reducese0
Value
approximately 40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduces joint-space motion cost by approximately 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planner increased joint-limit safety margins by about 28%.

Outcome
joint-limit safety marginse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
about 28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases joint-limit safety margins by about 28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planner maintained comparable planning time.

Outcome
planning timee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
comparable planning timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while maintaining comparable planning time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑