Paper · 2026 · Urban Science

Shrubs Matter: An Evaluation of the Capacity of Nine Shrub Species to Dissipate Latent Heat and to Remove CO2 and Airborne PM

Sebastien Comin; Denise Corsini; Irene Vigevani; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this research was to quantify the capacity of different shrub species to remove atmospheric CO2, to adsorb particulate matter and to dissipate latent heat through transpiration. A total of 308 established plants comprising Deutzia scabra, Elaeagnus × ebbingei, Euonymus japonicus, Forsythia × intermedia, Laurus nobilis, Ligustrum vulgare, Pittosporum tobira, Prunus laurocerasus and Viburnum tinus were selected in Lugano (Switzerland) and Bolzano (Italy). Stem diameter, crown radius, Leaf Area Index, net CO2 assimilation per unit leaf area (Aleaf), transpiration, and stomatal conductance (gs) were measured during spring, summer, and fall. The net CO2 assimilation per unit of crown projection area and per plant were calculated by upscaling Aleaf using a multilayer model. Latent heat dissipation was calculated using the Penman–Monteith equation. The amount of PM trapped on leaves was measured using a gravimetric method. Differences in leaf area and leaf gas exchange among species affected their capacity to deliver specific ecosystem services. Forsythia, Pittosporum, Elaeagnus and Deutzia removed about 40% more CO2 per unit crown projection area than Laurus, Ligustrum, and Euonymus. Latent heat dissipation by shrubs was, on average, 130 W m−2, which is comparable to that of tree species. PM removal per unit leaf area was higher in species with sparse canopies and rough leaf surfaces.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species differences in leaf area and gas exchange affected ecosystem service capacity.

Taxon
speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
capacity to deliver specific ecosystem servicese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in leaf area and leaf gas exchange among species affected their capacity to deliver specific ecosystem services.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four shrub genera removed about 40% more CO2 per crown projection area than three others.

Taxon
Forsythia, Pittosporum, Elaeagnus and DeutziaDeutziaPittosporumElaeagnusForsythiae0
Outcome
CO2 per unit crown projection areae0
Direction
moree0
Value
about 40%e0
Comparator
Laurus, Ligustrum, and Euonymuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Deutzia
Deutzia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pittosporum
Pittosporum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Elaeagnus
Elaeagnus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Forsythia
Forsythia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Seha bs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forsythia, Pittosporum, Elaeagnus and Deutzia removed about 40% more CO2 per unit crown projection area than Laurus, Ligustrum, and Euonymus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrubs dissipated 130 W m−2 latent heat on average, comparable to trees.

Taxon
shrubse0
Outcome
Latent heat dissipatione0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
130 W m−2e0
Comparator
tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Latent heat dissipation by shrubs was, on average, 130 W m−2, which is comparable to that of tree species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1314 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species with sparse canopies and rough leaves removed more PM per leaf area.

Taxon
speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
PM removal per unit leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
sparse canopies and rough leaf surfacese0

Verbatim

e0

“PM removal per unit leaf area was higher in species with sparse canopies and rough leaf surfaces.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1412 · show in text ↑