Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Linking fruit and stone morphology with germination and polyembryony in two mango genotypes, Olour and Kurukkan

Shikha Jain; Jai Prakash; S. K. Singh; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mango (Mangifera indica L.) productivity improvement depends partly on the identification and characterization of suitable polyembryonic genotypes used in propagation. Understanding the relationship between fruit and stone morphology and early reproductive traits such as germination and polyembryony is essential for effective germplasm utilization. The present study aimed to evaluate morphological variability, germination behavior, and polyembryony in two polyembryonic mango genotypes, 'Olour' and 'Kurukkan', grown at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. RESULTS: A total of 260 fruits were analyzed for fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, stone weight, stone length, and stone width, along with germination percentage, number of seedlings per stone, and polyembryony. Descriptive statistics indicated greater variability in mass-based traits compared to linear dimensions. Linear models revealed strong varietal differences in fruit weight, fruit width, stone weight, and stone width, whereas stone length exhibited relatively weak differentiation between genotypes. Correlation analysis showed strong positive associations among most fruit and stone traits, suggesting coordinated fruit-stone development. Allometric analysis demonstrated consistent sub-isometric scaling relationships, indicating conserved developmental allocation patterns across genotypes. Logistic and Poisson generalized linear models indicated that fruit and stone morphological traits had negligible influence on germination, seedling number per stone, and polyembryony. Deviance-based variance partitioning further revealed that varietal effects explained less than 1% of the variation in these early reproductive traits. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate strong developmental canalization of germination and polyembryony in polyembryonic mango genotypes. Despite clear morphological differences between 'Olour' and 'Kurukkan', early reproductive responses remain largely independent of fruit and stone morphology. These results provide important insights for germplasm characterization and support the use of polyembryonic genotypes in propagation-oriented mango improvement programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass-based mango traits varied more than linear dimensions.

Outcome
variability in mass-based traitse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
linear dimensionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater variability in mass-based traits compared to linear dimensions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango genotypes differed strongly in fruit weight and fruit width.

Outcome
fruit weight, fruit widthe0
Direction
strong varietal differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong varietal differences in fruit weight, fruit width, stone weight, and stone width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango genotypes differed strongly in stone weight and width.

Outcome
stone weight, and stone widthe0
Direction
strong varietal differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong varietal differences in fruit weight, fruit width, stone weight, and stone width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stone length showed relatively weak differentiation between genotypes.

Outcome
stone lengthe0
Direction
relatively weak differentiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stone length exhibited relatively weak differentiation between genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most mango fruit and stone traits showed strong positive associations.

Organ / stage
fruit and stonee0
Outcome
fruit and stone traitse0
Direction
strong positive associationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong positive associations among most fruit and stone traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and stone traits showed consistent sub-isometric scaling.

Organ / stage
fruit and stonee1
Outcome
sub-isometric scaling relationshipse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consistent sub-isometric scaling relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit and stone morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and stone morphology had negligible influence on germination.

Organ / stage
fruit and stonee0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
negligible influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit and stone morphological traits had negligible influence on germination, seedling number per stone, and polyembryony”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and stone morphology had negligible influence on seedling number per stone.

Organ / stage
fruit and stonee0
Outcome
seedling number per stonee0
Direction
negligible influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit and stone morphological traits had negligible influence on germination, seedling number per stone, and polyembryony”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and stone morphology had negligible influence on polyembryony.

Organ / stage
fruit and stonee0
Outcome
polyembryonye0
Direction
negligible influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit and stone morphological traits had negligible influence on germination, seedling number per stone, and polyembryony”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety explained less than 1% of variation in early reproductive traits.

Material
varietale0
Outcome
variation in these early reproductive traitse0
Value
less than 1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varietal effects explained less than 1% of the variation in these early reproductive traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑