Paper · 2026 · Agricultural Water Management

Improving net carbon balance and irrigation water productivity of subtropical organic double-rice cropping through a near-saturation water-saving management

Cheng-Hsien Lin; Yu-Yu Kung; Sung-Ching Lee; et al.

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Organic rice farming sustains soil productivity but risks elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from organic inputs, which can be mitigated by optimizing water-saving irrigation and implementing regenerative practices like cover cropping. Compared to the most common water-saving irrigation (-15 cm water level threshold), a more conservative near-saturation approach (reflooding at 0 cm) offers a potential paradigm for stabilizing yields; however, its integrated impact on the net carbon (C) outcomes remains poorly understood. This study evaluated a near-saturation water-saving strategy and winter cover cropping [Tartary buckwheat ( Fagopyrum tataricum )] to improve net C balance characteristic of subtropical organic double-rice systems in Taiwan (2023–2024). Compared to continuous flooding (CF), the near-saturation threshold significantly reduced cumulative CH 4 emissions and net GHG intensity by approximately 29% (1.37 vs. 0.97 Mg CO 2 -eq Mg −1 grain) while maintaining stable grain yield (∼5.24 Mg ha −1 ). Irrigation water productivity improved by 16.5% (0.92 vs. 0.79 kg grain m −3 irrigated water) under this near-saturation management. Furthermore, the near-saturation strategy resulted in a 17.3% reduction (CF: 23.32 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 vs. water-saving: 19.28 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 ) in the net ecosystem C source strength (net GHG emissions minus soil organic C sequestration) through the substantial CH 4 mitigation over the two-year period. Winter cover crop incorporation did not significantly influence GHG dynamics or crop productivity. These results demonstrate that a precision near-saturation threshold optimizes the environmental footprint of organic rice farming by significantly reducing net C source strength and improving water performance without compromising yield stability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Near-saturation irrigation reduced cumulative CH4 emissions by approximately 29% compared with continuous flooding in organic double-rice in Taiwan.

Treatment
near-saturation thresholde0
Outcome
cumulative CH 4 emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 29%e0
Comparator
continuous flooding (CF)e2
Setting
Taiwane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“the near-saturation threshold significantly reduced cumulative CH 4 emissions and net GHG intensity by approximately 29% (1.37 vs. 0.97 Mg CO 2 -eq Mg −1 grain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“subtropical organic double-rice systems in Taiwan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–755 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to continuous flooding (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Near-saturation irrigation reduced net GHG intensity from 1.37 to 0.97 Mg CO2-eq per Mg grain compared with continuous flooding in organic double-rice in Taiwan.

Treatment
near-saturation thresholde0
Outcome
net GHG intensitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.37 vs. 0.97 Mg CO 2 -eq Mg −1 graine0
Comparator
continuous flooding (CF)e2
Setting
Taiwane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“the near-saturation threshold significantly reduced cumulative CH 4 emissions and net GHG intensity by approximately 29% (1.37 vs. 0.97 Mg CO 2 -eq Mg −1 grain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“subtropical organic double-rice systems in Taiwan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–755 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to continuous flooding (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Near-saturation irrigation maintained stable grain yield (about 5.24 Mg/ha) compared with continuous flooding in organic double-rice.

Treatment
near-saturation thresholde0
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Value
∼5.24 Mg ha −1e3
Comparator
continuous flooding (CF)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“the near-saturation threshold significantly reduced cumulative CH 4 emissions and net GHG intensity by approximately 29% (1.37 vs. 0.97 Mg CO 2 -eq Mg −1 grain)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–967 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to continuous flooding (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–805 · show in text ↑
e3

“while maintaining stable grain yield (∼5.24 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Near-saturation management improved irrigation water productivity by 16.5% in organic double-rice.

Treatment
near-saturation managemente4
Outcome
Irrigation water productivitye4
Direction
improvede4
Value
16.5%e4
Qualifier
0.92 vs. 0.79 kg grain m −3 irrigated watere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“Irrigation water productivity improved by 16.5% (0.92 vs. 0.79 kg grain m −3 irrigated water) under this near-saturation management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The near-saturation strategy reduced the net ecosystem C source strength by 17.3% relative to continuous flooding over the two-year period.

Treatment
near-saturation strategye5
Outcome
net ecosystem C source strengthe5
Direction
reductione5
Value
17.3%e5
Qualifier
over the two-year periode5
Comparator
CFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“the near-saturation strategy resulted in a 17.3% reduction (CF: 23.32 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 vs. water-saving: 19.28 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 ) in the net ecosystem C source strength (net GHG emissions minus soil organic C sequestration) through the substantial CH 4 mitigation over the two-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1460 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced CH4 emission through near-saturation management explains the lower net ecosystem C source strength of organic double-rice.

Outcome
net ecosystem C source strengthe5
Qualifier
through the substantial CH 4 mitigatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“the near-saturation strategy resulted in a 17.3% reduction (CF: 23.32 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 vs. water-saving: 19.28 Mg CO 2 -eq ha −1 ) in the net ecosystem C source strength (net GHG emissions minus soil organic C sequestration) through the substantial CH 4 mitigation over the two-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter cover crop incorporation did not significantly change GHG dynamics or crop productivity.

Treatment
Winter cover crop incorporatione6
Outcome
GHG dynamics or crop productivitye6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic double-rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“Winter cover crop incorporation did not significantly influence GHG dynamics or crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1559 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.