Paper · 2026 · Annals of Botany

Allocation of growth to stems underpins the response of ryegrass to elevated CO2 and temperature

Charilaos Yiotis; Jennifer C McElwain; Bruce A Osborne

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Climate change poses significant challenges to the enhancement of crop productivity in pace with the increasing world population. Intraspecific variability in ryegrass responses to elevated CO2 can be exploited to screen for high-producing genotypes under future atmospheres and has been used to identify targets for breeding high CO2-ready cultivars. The present study expands on this approach by investigating the responses of multiple perennial and annual ryegrass genotypes to projected future atmospheric/climatic conditions. METHODS: Ten ryegrass genotypes of diverse origin were grown under ambient and elevated CO2 and higher temperature conditions (HTC), consistent with an intermediate IPCC scenario (RCP6.0). Morphometric measurements, gas analysis and CN analysis were used to assess the responses of their biomass production and allocation, photosynthetic physiology and carbon/nitrogen elemental composition to simulated future conditions. Genotypic variability in these responses was subsequently used to identify traits and trait responses that correlate strongly with increased productivity under elevated CO2 and higher temperature. RESULTS: Biomass responses to future conditions varied significantly across genotypes, spanning a 32% reduction to a 62% enhancement, but were unrelated to corresponding changes in leaf photosynthetic rates. Although plant productivity showed a significant positive relationship with estimates of the whole-plant carbon assimilation rate, there were clear signs of sink limitation under ambient and HTC, since this correlated strongly with the leaf C:N ratio and the biomass allocation to sink tissues, especially stems. Stem biomass allocation under future conditions increased significantly and scaled positively with the corresponding plant productivity responses. No similar trend was observed for root biomass allocation, which showed no significant differences between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Increased biomass allocation to the stem carbon sink is a key characteristic to exploit under future climate change conditions, and this would also maximize any benefits associated with an increase in leaf area on whole-plant carbon gain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype biomass responses ranged from a 32% reduction to a 62% enhancement.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Treatment
future conditionse0
Outcome
Biomass responsese0
Value
32% reduction to a 62% enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass responses to future conditions varied significantly across genotypes, spanning a 32% reduction to a 62% enhancement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass response was unrelated to changes in leaf photosynthetic rates.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Biomass responsese0
Direction
unrelatede0
Qualifier
changes in leaf photosynthetic ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass responses to future conditions varied significantly across genotypes, spanning a 32% reduction to a 62% enhancement, but were unrelated to corresponding changes in leaf photosynthetic rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant productivity had a significant positive relationship with whole plant carbon assimilation.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Outcome
plant productivitye0
Direction
positive relationshipe0
Qualifier
whole-plant carbon assimilation ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant productivity showed a significant positive relationship with estimates of the whole-plant carbon assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon assimilation correlated strongly with leaf C:N ratio.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
whole-plant carbon assimilation ratee0
Qualifier
leaf C:N ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although plant productivity showed a significant positive relationship with estimates of the whole-plant carbon assimilation rate, there were clear signs of sink limitation under ambient and HTC, since this correlated strongly with the leaf C:N ratio and the biomass allocation to sink tissues, especially stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon assimilation correlated strongly with allocation to sink tissues, especially stems.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
biomass allocation to sink tissuese0
Qualifier
leaf C:N ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this correlated strongly with the leaf C:N ratio and the biomass allocation to sink tissues, especially stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem allocation increased significantly under future conditions.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Treatment
future conditionse0
Outcome
Stem biomass allocatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem biomass allocation under future conditions increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem allocation scaled positively with productivity responses.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Organ / stage
Steme0
Outcome
Stem biomass allocatione0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
plant productivity responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem biomass allocation under future conditions increased significantly and scaled positively with the corresponding plant productivity responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1839 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root allocation had no significant treatment difference.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
root biomass allocatione0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root biomass allocation, which showed no significant differences between treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1958 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify increased stem carbon sink allocation as a useful breeding trait.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliumt0
Outcome
Increased biomass allocation to the stem carbon sinke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased biomass allocation to the stem carbon sink is a key characteristic to exploit under future climate change conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2098 · show in text ↑
t0

“ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑