Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in randomized block design for three consecutive years (2021-23) at Agricultural Research Sub-Station, Nagaur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur during rainy season to evaluate the efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides for complex weed flora, growth and yield of mung bean with twelve treatments and three replications. The results revealed that the lowest density (No./m2) of Rhinchosia minima (11.5), Digera arvensis (5.7), Celosia argentea (16.3), Cyperus rotundus (6.7), Dactyloctenium aegyptium (6.3), other broad leaves & grassy weeds (5.7), total weed dry weight (25.0 g/m2) and highest weed control efficiency (82.4%) was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha that was closely followed by fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop - P-butyl 11.1% SL 220 g/ha. Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl resulted in significant improvement in number of seeds per pod (13.6), 1000 grain weight (44.6 g), mean grain yield (12.3 q/ha), gross returns (?1,04,310/ha), net returns (?72,310/ha), BC ratio (2.1) and weed index (9.0). These similar treatments also resulted in 16.5 % more weed reduction and 20.5 % seed yield enhancement over the imazethapyr application. It was concluded that application of sodium acifluorfen 16.5%+ clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC (Readymix) or fomesafen 11.1% w/w + fluazifop-P-butyl 11.1% (Ready-mix) @ 220 g/ha can be used at 20-25 days after sowing for the control of complex weed flora in mung bean with higher yields and returns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl gave the lowest density of Rhinchosia minima (11.5 No./m2) in mung bean.
- Taxon
- Mung Bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- Rhinchosia minimae1weed
- Outcome
- density (No./m2) of Rhinchosia minimae1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 11.5e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2) of Rhinchosia minima (11.5)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest density of Digera arvensis (5.7 No./m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- Digera arvensise2weed
- Outcome
- density (No./m2)e1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 5.7e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“Digera arvensis (5.7)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest density of Celosia argentea (16.3 No./m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- Celosia argentea
_W_IMG_0985.jpg?width=60)
Celosia argenteae2weed - Outcome
- density (No./m2)e1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 16.3e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_W_IMG_0985.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“Celosia argentea (16.3)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest density of Cyperus rotundus (6.7 No./m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotunduse2weed - Outcome
- density (No./m2)e1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 6.7e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“Cyperus rotundus (6.7)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest density of Dactyloctenium aegyptium (6.3 No./m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- Dactyloctenium aegyptium
Dactyloctenium aegyptiume2weed - Outcome
- density (No./m2)e1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 6.3e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“Dactyloctenium aegyptium (6.3)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest density of other broad leaves and grassy weeds (5.7 No./m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Interactor
- other broad leaves & grassy weedse2weed
- Outcome
- density (No./m2)e1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 5.7e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“other broad leaves & grassy weeds (5.7)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the lowest total weed dry weight (25.0 g/m2).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Outcome
- total weed dry weighte2
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 25.0 g/m2e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“lowest density (No./m2)”
e2“total weed dry weight (25.0 g/m2)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave the highest weed control efficiency (82.4%).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/hae3
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 82.4%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“highest weed control efficiency (82.4%)”
e3“was recorded under sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop-propargyl 8% EC 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen + fluazifop-P-butyl at 220 g/ha closely followed the best weed-control treatment.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop - P-butyl 11.1% SL 220 g/hae1
- Outcome
- closely followede1
- Direction
- closely followede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“closely followed by fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop - P-butyl 11.1% SL 220 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Ready-mix sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl significantly improved the number of seeds per pod (13.6).
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- number of seeds per pode1
- Direction
- improvemente1
- Value
- 13.6e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl resulted in significant improvement in number of seeds per pod (13.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave a 1000 grain weight of 44.6 g.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 44.6 ge2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“1000 grain weight (44.6 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave a mean grain yield of 12.3 q/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- mean grain yielde2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 12.3 q/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“mean grain yield (12.3 q/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave gross returns of ?1,04,310/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- gross returnse2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- ?1,04,310/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“gross returns (?1,04,310/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave net returns of ?72,310/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- net returnse2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- ?72,310/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“net returns (?72,310/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave a BC ratio of 2.1.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- BC ratioe2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 2.1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“BC ratio (2.1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The ready mix gave a weed index of 9.0.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle1
- Outcome
- weed indexe2
- Value
- 9.0e2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Ready mix application of sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”
e2“weed index (9.0)”
Claim · model-written summary
These treatments gave 16.5% more weed reduction than imazethapyr.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- These similar treatmentse1
- Outcome
- weed reductione1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 16.5 %e1
- Comparator
- imazethapyr applicatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“These similar treatments also resulted in 16.5 % more weed reduction and 20.5 % seed yield enhancement over the imazethapyr application”
Claim · model-written summary
These treatments gave 20.5% higher seed yield than imazethapyr.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- These similar treatmentse1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- enhancemente1
- Value
- 20.5 %e1
- Comparator
- imazethapyr applicatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“These similar treatments also resulted in 16.5 % more weed reduction and 20.5 % seed yield enhancement over the imazethapyr application”
Claim · model-written summary
Ready-mix sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl or fomesafen + fluazifop-P-butyl at 220 g/ha applied 20-25 days after sowing can be used to control complex weed flora in mung bean with higher yields and returns.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- control of complex weed florae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“can be used at 20-25 days after sowing for the control of complex weed flora in mung bean with higher yields and returns”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →acifluorfen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
sodium atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sodium atom · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →acifluorfen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.