Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during the rainy (Kharif) season of 2017 to 2019 at Jodhpur, Rajasthan to find the herbicide effective for mungbean [Vigna radiate (l.) R. Wilczek] in arid regions. The treatments comprised pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides along with hand-weeding, weed-free, and unweeded. Results re- vealed that, weed-control treatments brought about a 48.973.3% reduction in total weeds density and 46.8 80.1% reduction in dry weed weight at harvesting as compared to unweeded control. Post-emergence application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha, being at par to other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weeding, resulted in significantly lowest total weed density (24.1/m2) and total weed dry weight (66.6 g/m2) with highest weed-control efficiency (80.1%) and showed the lowest values of weed index (18.4). Moreover, post-emergence application of clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha also exhibited weed-control efficiency (73.2%) and weed index (21.0) at par with other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weeding. Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2), pods/plant (24.7), 1,000-seed weight (55.2 g), seed yield (840 kg/ha), and stover yield (2,563 kg/ha). Application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha also registered highest gross returns (`58.08 103/ha) and net returns (`42.58 103/ha) which were comparable to returns recorded under clodinafop-propargyl + sodium-acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha. Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha being comparable with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium-acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha was also found superior in terms of impact assessment indices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-control treatments reduced total weed density 48.973.3% versus unweeded control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
weed-control treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total weeds densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
48.973.3%e0
Comparator
unweeded controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed-control treatments brought about a 48.973.3% reduction in total weeds density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed-control treatments brought about a 48.973.3% reduction in total weeds density and 46.8 80.1% reduction in dry weed weight at harvesting as compared to unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-control treatments reduced dry weed weight 46.8 80.1% versus unweeded control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
weed-control treatmentse1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weed weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
46.8 80.1%e0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“46.8 80.1% reduction in dry weed weight at harvesting as compared to unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed-control treatments brought about a 48.973.3% reduction in total weeds density and 46.8 80.1% reduction in dry weed weight at harvesting as compared to unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave the lowest total weed density, 24.1/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
24.1/m2e0
Comparator
other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha, being at par to other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weeding, resulted in significantly lowest total weed density (24.1/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave the lowest total weed dry weight, 66.6 g/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./hae1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
66.6 g/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total weed dry weight (66.6 g/m2) with highest weed-control efficiency (80.1%) and showed the lowest values of weed index (18.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“Post-emergence application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr achieved highest weed-control efficiency of 80.1%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./hae1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
80.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest weed-control efficiency (80.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“Post-emergence application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave the lowest weed index, 18.4.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./hae1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
18.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed the lowest values of weed index (18.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“Post-emergence application of propaquizafop + imazethapyr @125 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus sodium acifluorfen achieved 73.2% weed-control efficiency.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Value
73.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha also exhibited weed-control efficiency (73.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus sodium acifluorfen produced a weed index of 21.0.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./hae1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
at pare0
Value
21.0e0
Comparator
other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed index (21.0) at par with other imazethapyr treatments and hand-weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha also exhibited weed-control efficiency (73.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr significantly increased crop dry weight to 542 g/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
crop dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
542 g/m2e0
Comparator
clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr produced 24.7 pods per plant.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae1
Outcome
pods/plante0
Value
24.7e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pods/plant (24.7), 1,000-seed weight (55.2 g), seed yield (840 kg/ha), and stover yield (2,563 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr produced 1,000-seed weight of 55.2 g.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae1
Outcome
1,000-seed weighte0
Value
55.2 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1,000-seed weight (55.2 g), seed yield (840 kg/ha), and stover yield (2,563 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr produced seed yield of 840 kg/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
840 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (840 kg/ha), and stover yield (2,563 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr produced stover yield of 2,563 kg/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae1
Outcome
stover yielde0
Value
2,563 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield (2,563 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha, being at par with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free recorded significantly higher crop dry weight (542 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave the highest gross returns, `58.08 103/ha.

Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
`58.08 103/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“highest gross returns (`58.08 103/ha) and net returns (`42.58 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr gave the highest net returns, `42.58 103/ha.

Outcome
net returnse0
Value
`42.58 103/hae0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (`42.58 103/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr was superior on impact assessment indices and comparable to clodinafop plus sodium acifluorfen.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
impact assessment indicese0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
clodinafop-propargyl + sodium-acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaquizafop + imazethapyr @ 125 g a.i./ha being comparable with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium-acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha was also found superior in terms of impact assessment indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

propaquizafop · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

propaquizafop · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sodium atom · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

acifluorfen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.