Paper · 2022 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Yield and Seed Quality of Summer Green Gram as Influenced by Weed Management under Zero Tillage

Kuldeep Singh; Hardev Ram; Rakesh Kumar; et al.

11
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram, which can be minimized with adoption of proper weed management practices. This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition. Methods: In this field-laboratory investigation conducted during summer season 2019 on different herbicides were applied to manage weeds in summer green gram. Eight treatments were applied based on various application windows. In the field and laboratory, the collected samples were determined for growth parameters, nutrient uptakes, seed yield and seed quality of summer green gram. Result: The result revealed that weed free treatment recorded higher growth parameters like, plant height, number of branch/plant, number of leaves/plant and root biomass which was statically at par with Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) as post-emergence (POE) at 20 DAS and Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS. Same trends were also observed in seed yield, nutrient content and uptake by seeds. Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher growth parameters in summer green gram.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee1
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
highere1
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result revealed that weed free treatment recorded higher growth parameters like, plant height, number of branch/plant, number of leaves/plant and root biomass which was statically at par with Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) as post-emergence (POE) at 20 DAS and Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaked (propaquizafop + imazethapyr) post-emergence gave growth parameters statistically at par with weed-free treatment.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper)e1
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
weed freee1
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result revealed that weed free treatment recorded higher growth parameters like, plant height, number of branch/plant, number of leaves/plant and root biomass which was statically at par with Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) as post-emergence (POE) at 20 DAS and Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin pre-emergence followed by one hand weeding gave growth parameters statistically at par with weed-free treatment.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DASe1
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
weed freee1
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result revealed that weed free treatment recorded higher growth parameters like, plant height, number of branch/plant, number of leaves/plant and root biomass which was statically at par with Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) as post-emergence (POE) at 20 DAS and Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave the same trends in seed yield, nutrient content and nutrient uptake by seeds.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee1
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
seed yield, nutrient content and uptake by seedse2
Direction
Same trendse2
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result revealed that weed free treatment recorded higher growth parameters like, plant height, number of branch/plant, number of leaves/plant and root biomass which was statically at par with Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) as post-emergence (POE) at 20 DAS and Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–1076 · show in text ↑
e2

“Same trends were also observed in seed yield, nutrient content and uptake by seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave germination of 98.00%.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
germination per cente3
Direction
highere3
Value
98.00e3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher shoot length of 25.63 cm.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
shoote3
Direction
highere3
Value
25.63 cme3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher root length of 14.20 cm.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
roote3
Direction
highere3
Value
14.20 cme3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher seedling length of 39.83 cm.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
seedling lengthe3
Direction
highere3
Value
39.83 cme3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher seedling dry weight of 0.16 g.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
seedling dry weighte3
Direction
highere3
Value
0.16 ge3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher vigour index I of 3903.33.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
vigour index Ie3
Direction
highere3
Value
3903.33e3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment gave higher vigour index II of 14.96.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
weed freee3
Interactor
Weedse7weed
Outcome
vigour index IIe3
Direction
highere3
Value
14.96e3
Comparator
weed checke3
Setting
zero tillage conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This field experiment was conducted to find out the effective weed management practice in summer green gram (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–339 · show in text ↑
e7

“Weeds are primary factors that adversely affect growth, yield and seed quality of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed quality parameters like germination per cent (98.00), shoot (25.63 cm) root (14.20 cm) and seedling length (39.83 cm), seedling dry weight (0.16 g), vigour index I (3903.33) and vigour index II (14.96) was higher under weed free followed by Shaked (Propaquizafop + Imezathyper) and Pendimethalin as (PE followed by one hand weeding 20 DAS over weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1521 · show in text ↑

propaquizafop · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr significantly increased crop dry weight to 542 g/m2.

    Weed control efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in hot arid regions · 2001 · compared with clodinafop-propargyl + sodium acifluorfen @ 312.5 g a.i./ha and weed-free

    No difference from an alternative

See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.