Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Acetachlor plus hand weeding was superior to acetachlor alone against weeds.

A claim from Efficacy of Trifluralin, Linuron and Acetachlor against Weeds in Mungbean (Vigna radiata) · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetachlor plus hand weeding was superior to acetachlor alone against weeds.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
acetachlor 1.0 kg/ha (pre-emergence)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
against weedse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
their alone applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trifluralin 0.75 kg/ha (PPI), linuron 0.75 kg/ha and acetachlor 1.0 kg/ha (pre-emergence) each integrated with one hand weeding at 30 DAS was superior to their alone application against weeds in mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–344

Title

Efficacy of Trifluralin, Linuron and Acetachlor against Weeds in Mungbean (Vigna radiata)

R. S. Malik; Ashok Yadav; R. K. Malik Indian Journal of Weed Science 2000

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e234d78597e6d71ba5d964eeb7465e54e6aa6b07969bac8f50e0af03d0678a0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Sequential herbicides reduced weed dry weight more than a single application.

    Effect of sequential application of herbicides on weed control indices and productivity of rainy-season greengram (Vigna radiata) in north Indian plains · 2001 · compared with 1 time application

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Sequential herbicide application was more effective than a single application in suppressing weed growth in greengram.

    Weed biomass and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata) as affected by sequential application of herbicides in Indo-Gangetic Plains · 2016 · compared with their one time application either PE or POE

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Integrated weed management lowered weed biomass 44.3% versus unweeded W3 at 30 days.

    Conservation Tillage and Weed Management Influencing Weed Dynamics, Crop Performance, Soil Properties, and Profitability in a Rice–Wheat–Greengram System in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain · 2023 · compared with treatment W3

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Hand weeding significantly lowered weed density and dry weight.

    Effect of Herbicide Application on Weed Management in Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2015

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Postemergence imazethapyr at 75 g/ha was effective in controlling sedges, grassy and broad-leaf weeds.

    Effect of herbicides on weeds growth and yield of greengram · 2015

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Quizalofop-p-ethyl at 21 DAE plus hand weeding at 28 DAE gave the maximum reduction of weed population.

    Effect of different weed management practices in summer mungbean [Vigna radiata L.] under new alluvial zone of West Bengal. · 2009

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Integrated weed management reduced weed density by about 50% versus imazethapyr alone.

    Impact of nutrient management in rice-maize-greengram cropping system and integrated weed management treatments on summer greengram productivity · 2022 · compared with imazethapyr

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Twice hand weeding produced significantly lower weed dry weight and superior weed control efficiency.

    Evaluation of different herbicides against weeds in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2019

    Same direction

64 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.