Abstract
Pulses are inexpensive and widely consumed sources of protein in the human diet. They have enormous potential for enhancing human health, environmental protection, soil conservation and contributing to global food security. Currently in Indian agriculture, micronutrient deficiency is one of the major obstacles in crop production. Hence, a research trial was carried out to evaluate influence of foliar application of boron, urea and zinc on growth and yield of green gram during 2021 at Research Farm, Lovely Professional University, Punjab. This experiment was conducted in randomized block design (RBD) including 8 treatments with 3 replications. The treatments comprised of foliar application of urea at 2 %, single super phosphate (SSP) at 2 %, borax at 0.2 %, zinc ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at 0.1 %, urea at 2 % + SSP at 2 %, urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 %, urea at 2 % + zinc EDTA at 0.1 % and control (no foliar application). The results indicated that, significantly higher growth parameters, physiological parameters, yield parameters and seed yield (14.3 q ha-1) were recorded in foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 % as compared with other treatments. However, foliar application of urea at 2 % + SSP at 2 % was statistically at par with foliar application of urea at 2 % + zinc EDTA at 0.1 %. Contrarily, control treatment produced significantly lower values as compared to foliar application treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Urea plus borax gave significantly higher growth and physiological parameters than other treatments.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 %e0
- Outcome
- growth parameters, physiological parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher growth parameters, physiological parameters, yield parameters and seed yield (14.3 q ha-1) were recorded in foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 % as compared with other treatments”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea plus borax gave significantly higher yield parameters than other treatments.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 %e0
- Outcome
- yield parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher growth parameters, physiological parameters, yield parameters and seed yield (14.3 q ha-1) were recorded in foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 % as compared with other treatments”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea plus borax gave seed yield of 14.3 q ha-1, significantly higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 %e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.3 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher growth parameters, physiological parameters, yield parameters and seed yield (14.3 q ha-1) were recorded in foliar application of urea at 2 % + borax at 0.2 % as compared with other treatments”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea plus SSP performed statistically at par with urea plus zinc EDTA.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of urea at 2 % + SSP at 2 %e0
- Outcome
- statistically at pare0
- Comparator
- foliar application of urea at 2 % + zinc EDTA at 0.1 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of urea at 2 % + SSP at 2 % was statistically at par with foliar application of urea at 2 % + zinc EDTA at 0.1 %”
t0“green gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated control had significantly lower values than foliar treatments.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- control treatmente0
- Outcome
- valuese0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- foliar application treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“control treatment produced significantly lower values as compared to foliar application treatments”
t0“green gram”
The same questions in other papers
borax · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →borax · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
212 papers more in this group
See all 216 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.