Paper · 2026 · Weed Technology

Greenhouse Evaluation of Napropamide and Pendimethalin for Suppression of Strawberry Daughter Plant Rooting and Runner Management Implications

Jeanine Arana; Stephen L. Meyers; Wenjing Guan; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract In plasticulture strawberry systems where growers intend to maintain plantings into a second harvest season, stolons (runners) are undesirable because they produce daughter plants that divert resources from the mother plant and complicate field maintenance. Manual runner removal is labor-intensive, and removal becomes more challenging once daughter plants have rooted in the row middles. Napropamide and pendimethalin were evaluated in greenhouse studies to assess their potential to suppress daughter-plant rooting and facilitate runner removal. Greenhouse studies used a threepot experimental unit consisting of one strawberry mother plant with two runners, each bearing one unrooted daughter plant, and two side pots simulating row middles. Three simulated herbicide application treatments were evaluated, including broadcast (foliar + side pot spray), in-row (foliar spray only), and row-middle (side pot spray only) applications, and were compared against a nontreated control. On mother plants, napropamide caused transient foliar injury but did not affect runner production or biomass. On daughter plants, napropamide caused transient injury and suppressed new growth at 4 wk after treatment (WAT), reducing daughter-plant biomass by 59–68%. Napropamide also eliminated the pull force required for removal relative to the nontreated control and reduced above- and belowground biomass up to 49% and by >95%, respectively, demonstrating effective suppression of runner establishment by reducing daughter plant rooting. However, suppression was transient; by 8 WAT, only the broadcast treatment consistently maintained rooting inhibition, likely due to herbicide degradation over time. Pendimethalin caused no effects on mother plants or daughter plants under any application method and failed to inhibit daughter plant rooting entirely. These results suggest that napropamide applied to the row middles, the only label-compliant method evaluated, can effectively suppress daughter plant rooting for at least one month, providing growers with a supplementary benefit of eased runner removal during summer weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide did not affect runner production or biomass of strawberry mother plants relative to the nontreated control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
napropamidee0
Outcome
runner production or biomasse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“On mother plants, napropamide caused transient foliar injury but did not affect runner production or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared against a nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide caused transient foliar injury on strawberry mother plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
napropamidee0
Outcome
transient foliar injurye0
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“On mother plants, napropamide caused transient foliar injury but did not affect runner production or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared against a nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide suppressed new growth of strawberry daughter plants at 4 weeks after treatment, reducing daughter-plant biomass by 59–68%.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
napropamidee0
Outcome
daughter-plant biomasse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
59–68%e0
Qualifier
4 wk after treatment (WAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“napropamide caused transient injury and suppressed new growth at 4 wk after treatment (WAT), reducing daughter-plant biomass by 59–68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide eliminated the pull force required for removal of daughter plants relative to the nontreated control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Napropamidee0
Outcome
pull force required for removale0
Direction
eliminatede0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Napropamide also eliminated the pull force required for removal relative to the nontreated control and reduced above- and belowground biomass up to 49% and by >95%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide reduced aboveground biomass by up to 49% relative to the nontreated control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Napropamidee0
Outcome
above- and belowground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 49%e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Napropamide also eliminated the pull force required for removal relative to the nontreated control and reduced above- and belowground biomass up to 49% and by >95%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide reduced belowground biomass by more than 95% relative to the nontreated control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Napropamidee0
Outcome
belowground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
>95%e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Napropamide also eliminated the pull force required for removal relative to the nontreated control and reduced above- and belowground biomass up to 49% and by >95%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 8 weeks after treatment only the broadcast napropamide treatment consistently maintained inhibition of daughter plant rooting.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
broadcast treatmente0
Outcome
rooting inhibitione0
Qualifier
by 8 WATe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“by 8 WAT, only the broadcast treatment consistently maintained rooting inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin had no effects on strawberry mother plants or daughter plants under any application method.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Pendimethaline0
Outcome
effects on mother plants or daughter plantse0
Direction
no effectse0
Qualifier
under any application methode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pendimethalin caused no effects on mother plants or daughter plants under any application method and failed to inhibit daughter plant rooting entirely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin failed to inhibit daughter plant rooting entirely.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Pendimethaline0
Outcome
daughter plant rootinge0
Direction
failed to inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pendimethalin caused no effects on mother plants or daughter plants under any application method and failed to inhibit daughter plant rooting entirely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1851 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that napropamide applied to the row middles, the only label-compliant method evaluated, can effectively suppress daughter plant rooting for at least one month.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
napropamide applied to the row middlese0
Outcome
daughter plant rootinge0
Qualifier
for at least one monthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“napropamide applied to the row middles, the only label-compliant method evaluated, can effectively suppress daughter plant rooting for at least one month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2033 · show in text ↑

napropamide · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

napropamide · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pendimethalin · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.