Paper · 2016 · AgroLife Scientific Journal

INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE UPON WEEDS, PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICAL EFFICIENCY OF CORN CROP

Felicia CHETAN; Teodor RUSU; Cornel CHETAN; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The research of some alternative variants to conventional soil tillage (characterized by furrow ploughing) targeted the setup and promotion of some technologies adapted to concrete conditions from different agricultural areas, regarding especially the type of soil, the climate conditions, the land orography and the technical equipment available. The objectives were surveyed from an agronomical, ecological and economical point of view. The failure in putting into practice many of the alternative variants of soil tillage were related to crop weeds, cultural defects and lower productions. The paper presents the results of the research made under the conditions of a Phaeozem situated in the Transylvanian Plain, regarding the influence of soil tillage system conventional system and minimum tillage - with chisel) and the fertilization & herbicide system upon the degree of weeds, production and economical of corn crop, during 2011-2014. The soil tillage system and climate conditions of the agricultural year influenced the weeds in the corn crop. In the case of minimum tillage bigger weeds have been registered, of 33.67 weeds/m2 compared to the conventional tillage, with 29.17 weeds/m2. In a drought year, respectively 2012, weeds grew the most (35.50 weeds/m2), they reduce during a normal climate year 2013, to 27.50 weeds/m2, and in 2014 which was considered a rainy year, favorable to corn crop, weeds were 31.25 weeds/m2. The soil tillage system hasn’t influenced significantly corn productions, they were almost equal in the two systems. Corn production is influenced significantly by the climate conditions of the agricultural year, ranging between 5392-6102 kg/ha. The economic efficiency of the minimum tillage system is higher and it results from the reduction of fuel consumption to 84.4 l/ha compared to conventional system, which needs 101.5 liters/ha for all the soil tillage. Subtracting total expenses (material and fuel) from the value of the production made within each technological system it results a profit of 112.9 lei/ha, which overall minimum tillage technology means a reduction by 6.6%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had more weeds than conventional tillage.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
biggere0
Value
33.67 weeds/m2e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of minimum tillage bigger weeds have been registered, of 33.67 weeds/m2 compared to the conventional tillage, with 29.17 weeds/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was greatest in drought year 2012.

Outcome
weedse0
Direction
grew the moste0
Value
35.50 weeds/m2e0
Setting
2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a drought year, respectively 2012, weeds grew the most (35.50 weeds/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density fell to 27.50 weeds/m² in normal climate year 2013.

Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
27.50 weeds/m2e0
Setting
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they reduce during a normal climate year 2013, to 27.50 weeds/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was 31.25 weeds/m² in rainy year 2014.

Outcome
weedse0
Value
31.25 weeds/m2e0
Setting
2014e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2014 which was considered a rainy year, favorable to corn crop, weeds were 31.25 weeds/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn production did not differ significantly between tillage systems.

Treatment
soil tillage systeme0
Outcome
corn productionse0
Direction
almost equale0
Comparator
the two systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil tillage system hasn’t influenced significantly corn productions, they were almost equal in the two systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate conditions significantly influenced corn production, which ranged from 5392 to 6102 kg/ha.

Outcome
Corn productione0
Value
5392-6102 kg/hae0
Setting
climate conditions of the agricultural yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn production is influenced significantly by the climate conditions of the agricultural year, ranging between 5392-6102 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage was more economically efficient than conventional tillage.

Treatment
minimum tillage systeme0
Outcome
economic efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic efficiency of the minimum tillage system is higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage reduced fuel consumption to 84.4 l/ha versus 101.5 liters/ha under conventional tillage.

Treatment
minimum tillagee1
Outcome
fuel consumptione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84.4 l/hae0
Qualifier
101.5 liters/hae0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction of fuel consumption to 84.4 l/ha compared to conventional system, which needs 101.5 liters/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–1930 · show in text ↑
e1

“minimum tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum tillage system yielded a reported profit of 112.9 lei/ha and a 6.6% reduction.

Outcome
profite0
Value
112.9 lei/hae0
Qualifier
a reduction by 6.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a profit of 112.9 lei/ha, which overall minimum tillage technology means a reduction by 6.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2178 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 27 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

tillage · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The Nebraska till-plant system moved weed seed away from the corn row.

    Effect of Seedbed Preparation for Corn on Distribution of Weed Seed · 1971 · compared with conventional disking and plowing system of seedbed preparation

    Opposite direction

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.