Paper · 2026 · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology

Induced Resistance in Common Bean Reduces Bacterial Blight but Does Not Improve Yield

Bruno Henrique Fontoura; Daiane Bressan; Lucas Vinícius Dallacorte; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Common bacterial blight (CBB), caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli, severely limits common bean production worldwide. This study evaluated whether induced resistance using acibenzolar- S -methyl (ASM) and harpin protein (HRP) can mitigate disease severity while maintaining plant physiological performance and yield. Two cultivars contrasting in CBB susceptibility (IAPAR 31 and IPR-Colibri) were treated with elicitors and inoculated with the pathogen. Disease severity, gas exchange, peroxidase activity, phenolic content, and yield components were assessed. Both ASM and HRP significantly reduced disease severity, with reductions of up to 79% in the susceptible cultivar. Elicitor treatments enhanced peroxidase activity and phenolic accumulation, indicating the activation of plant defense responses. ASM also improved photosynthetic parameters, including CO 2 assimilation and water use efficiency. However, no significant increases in yield or yield components were observed. These results indicate that although elicitors effectively induce resistance and improve physiological responses, this does not necessarily translate into productivity gains, highlighting a trade-off between defense activation and plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM significantly reduced bacterial blight severity, by up to 79% in the susceptible cultivar.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
ASMe0
Interactor
Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoliXanthomonas phaseoli pv. phaseolie1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ASM and HRP significantly reduced disease severity, with reductions of up to 79% in the susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HRP significantly reduced bacterial blight severity, by up to 79% in the susceptible cultivar.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
HRPe0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both ASM and HRP significantly reduced disease severity, with reductions of up to 79% in the susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elicitor treatments increased peroxidase activity and phenolic accumulation.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Elicitor treatmentse0
Outcome
peroxidase activity and phenolic accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elicitor treatments enhanced peroxidase activity and phenolic accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM improved CO 2 assimilation and water use efficiency.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
ASMe0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation and water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASM also improved photosynthetic parameters, including CO 2 assimilation and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elicitors did not significantly increase yield or yield components.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
elicitorse1
Outcome
yield or yield componentse0
Direction
no significant increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant increases in yield or yield components were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1042 · show in text ↑
e1

“elicitors effectively induce resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. phaseoli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

resistance inducer · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

resistance inducer · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.