Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences

Response of Three Rice Cultivars to the Intermittent Irrigation in Southern Iraq

Saad Flaih Hassan

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties (Anber 33, Yasamin, and Furat 1). Two irrigation methods were practiced: continuous ponding and intermittent water application where irrigation water was scheduled at three different intervals (3, 5 and 7 days).The trial was performed as split plot based on a complete randomized blocks design (RCBD) having three replications. Seedlings were transplanted 20 days following germination into rows. 30 cm a part with 20 cm distance between plants within rows. The results showed that the 3-days, 5-days and 7-days intervals of irrigation consumed 50%, 45% and 36% as much water, as continuous flood. The 3-days irrigation interval increased yield by 2% compared with continuous flood while the 7-days irrigation interval decreased yield by 15% compared with continuous flood. Furat1 and Yasamin varieties manifested higher water compared with Anber33. Water productivity of Furat 1 and Yasamin were 0.6108kg.m-3 and 0.5667kg.m-3 respectively. It is concluded that replacing current continuous submergence of rice crops with 3-days interval irrigation will lead to a substantial saving of water, about 50%, while raising yields; and having 7-days interval irrigation could indeed give much-improved productivity of water (grain produced per unit of water).This latter option should be considered even if it does not maximize grain produced per unit of land area in as much as water is becoming a resource more limiting than land for Iraqi agriculture. This water management strategy could help to deal with the shortage in water that is facing Iraqi farmers now and in the foreseeable future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 3-day irrigation interval consumed 50% as much water as continuous flood in rice.

Treatment
3-dayse1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
consumede1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
continuous floode1
Setting
Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the 3-days, 5-days and 7-days intervals of irrigation consumed 50%, 45% and 36% as much water, as continuous flood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5-day irrigation interval consumed 45% as much water as continuous flood in rice.

Treatment
5-dayse1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
consumede1
Value
45%e1
Comparator
continuous floode1
Setting
Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the 3-days, 5-days and 7-days intervals of irrigation consumed 50%, 45% and 36% as much water, as continuous flood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 7-day irrigation interval consumed 36% as much water as continuous flood in rice.

Treatment
7-dayse1
Outcome
watere1
Direction
consumede1
Value
36%e1
Comparator
continuous floode1
Setting
Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the 3-days, 5-days and 7-days intervals of irrigation consumed 50%, 45% and 36% as much water, as continuous flood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 3-day irrigation interval increased rice yield by 2% compared with continuous flood.

Treatment
3-days irrigation intervale2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
2%e2
Comparator
continuous floode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3-days irrigation interval increased yield by 2% compared with continuous flood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 7-day irrigation interval decreased rice yield by 15% compared with continuous flood.

Treatment
7-days irrigation intervale3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
15%e3
Comparator
continuous floode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the 7-days irrigation interval decreased yield by 15% compared with continuous flood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–976 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furat 1 and Yasamin manifested higher water use than Anber 33 in rice.

Material
Furat1 and Yasamine4
Outcome
watere4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
Anber33e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furat1 and Yasamin varieties manifested higher water compared with Anber33”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity of Furat 1 rice was 0.6108 kg/m3.

Material
Furat 1e5
Outcome
Water productivitye5
Value
0.6108kg.m-3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water productivity of Furat 1 and Yasamin were 0.6108kg.m-3 and 0.5667kg.m-3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity of Yasamin rice was 0.5667 kg/m3.

Material
Yasamine5
Outcome
Water productivitye5
Value
0.5667kg.m-3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water productivity of Furat 1 and Yasamin were 0.6108kg.m-3 and 0.5667kg.m-3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1143 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing continuous submergence of rice with 3-day interval irrigation is recommended to save about 50% of water while raising yields.

Taxon
rice cropsOryza sativae6
Treatment
3-days interval irrigatione6
Outcome
saving of watere6
Value
about 50%e6
Qualifier
while raising yieldse6
Comparator
continuous submergencee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e6

“replacing current continuous submergence of rice crops with 3-days interval irrigation will lead to a substantial saving of water, about 50%, while raising yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1328 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 7-day irrigation interval could give much-improved water productivity in rice.

Treatment
7-days interval irrigatione7
Outcome
productivity of watere7
Qualifier
could indeed givee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted at Al-Mishkhab Rice Research Station during 2011 season, to assess the effects of irrigation intervals on water productivity and yield components of three local rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
e7

“having 7-days interval irrigation could indeed give much-improved productivity of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1421 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.