Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Achieving More with Less Water: Alternate Wet and Dry Irrigation (AWDI) as an Alternative to the Conventional Water Management Practices in Rice Farming

Tejendra Chapagain; Andrew Riseman; Eiji Yamaji

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
38
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Alternate Wet and Dry Irrigation (AWDI) is a water management system where rice fields are not kept continuously submerged but are allowed to dry intermittently during the rice growing stage. A field experiment was conducted in Chiba, Japan during the rice growing season (May-September) of 2008 to assess AWDI and continuous submerged water management practices for their effects on productivity, the surrounding environment, water savings, and Water Productivity Index (WPI). The impact of age of seedlings and plant spacing were also assessed. AWDI using the proposed irrigation schedule of 10 wet days alternated with 10 dry days used less water (29% less water) without significant reduction in grain yield (7.2 t/h) compared with conventional irrigation (7.8 t/h). Water Productivity Index was significantly higher in all sub-plots in AWDI treatments. WPI was 1.7 kg/m3 in AWDI treatments compared to 1.3 kg/m3 in conventional water management. Additional significant results from AWDI treatment included reduced pest and disease incidence, shortened crop cycle, and reduced lodging. However, slightly higher grain yields were observed in all sub-plots of the conventional irrigation treatment than were observed in the same combinations under AWDI. This underscores the need for further research in defining what constitutes an optimum interval for AWDI considering local soil properties, prevailing climate, and the critical periods during the rice growth cycle when the yield was particularly sensitive to moisture stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI used 29% less water.

Treatment
AWDI using the proposed irrigation schedule of 10 wet days alternated with 10 dry dayse0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
conventional irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWDI using the proposed irrigation schedule of 10 wet days alternated with 10 dry days used less water (29% less water) without significant reduction in grain yield (7.2 t/h) compared with conventional irrigation (7.8 t/h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI grain yield was 7.2 t/h versus 7.8 t/h under conventional irrigation, without significant reduction.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7.2 t/he0
Qualifier
7.8 t/he0
Comparator
conventional irrigatione0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without significant reduction in grain yield (7.2 t/h) compared with conventional irrigation (7.8 t/h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI significantly raised WPI across subplots, to 1.7 versus 1.3 kg/m3.

Treatment
AWDI treatmentse0
Outcome
Water Productivity Indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.7 kg/m3e0
Qualifier
1.3 kg/m3e0
Comparator
conventional water managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water Productivity Index was significantly higher in all sub-plots in AWDI treatments. WPI was 1.7 kg/m3 in AWDI treatments compared to 1.3 kg/m3 in conventional water management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI reduced pest and disease incidence.

Treatment
AWDI treatmente0
Outcome
pest and disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional significant results from AWDI treatment included reduced pest and disease incidence, shortened crop cycle, and reduced lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI shortened the crop cycle.

Treatment
AWDI treatmente0
Outcome
crop cyclee0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional significant results from AWDI treatment included reduced pest and disease incidence, shortened crop cycle, and reduced lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWDI reduced lodging.

Treatment
AWDI treatmente0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional significant results from AWDI treatment included reduced pest and disease incidence, shortened crop cycle, and reduced lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional irrigation yielded slightly more grain across matched subplots.

Treatment
conventional irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
AWDIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly higher grain yields were observed in all sub-plots of the conventional irrigation treatment than were observed in the same combinations under AWDI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors call for research on the optimal AWDI interval under local soil, climate and growth-stage conditions.

Outcome
further research in defining what constitutes an optimum interval for AWDIe0
Qualifier
considering local soil properties, prevailing climate, and the critical periods during the rice growth cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This underscores the need for further research in defining what constitutes an optimum interval for AWDI considering local soil properties, prevailing climate, and the critical periods during the rice growth cycle when the yield was particularly sensitive to moisture stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑

irrigation · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.