Paper · 2014 · Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal

THE EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIGATION AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM AND BORON ON GROWTH AND YIELD FOR FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)

H. A. Mohammad

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was carried out during fall season of ( 2012-2013) at experimental field , Horticulture Department , College of Agriculture – University of Diyala, to study the moisture depletion concentrations of Potassium and Boron applied on foliar on Plant height ,leaf area, grain yield, proline and protein contend of faba bean (Vicia faba, L.) cultivar (Babylon). The layout of the experiments was Split- split plot design as RCBD with three replicates. Three concentration of Potassium 4500 ,5000 ,5500mgK.L-1added as K2SO4 (41%K)and three concentrations of Boron 0 , 300 , 350 mgB.L-1 used Boric acid (17.4%B) and three periods of irrigation after25,50,75% depletion of available water . Foliar application were applied at three times during of plant growth. Results drawn from this experiment are summarized as follows: The differ significantly in all of characters with increasing Potassium concentrations . Plant height ,leaf area and grain yield increased with the second level of Boron concentration (5000) mgB.L-1.. The differ were significantly between Potassium levels and water stress levels in most of characters. Plant height ,leaf area and grain yield increased with the interaction between water stress levels x the second Boron levels . Also the most of characters were significantly influenced by interaction between moisture levels x Potassium and boron concentrations . Boron did not effect the proline and protein content , proline and protein increase with water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium concentrations significantly affected all measured faba bean characters.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing Potassium concentrationse0
Outcome
all of characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The differ significantly in all of characters with increasing Potassium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated second boron level increased faba bean plant height, leaf area and grain yield.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
second level of Boron concentration (5000) mgB.L-1e0
Outcome
Plant height ,leaf area and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height ,leaf area and grain yield increased with the second level of Boron concentration (5000) mgB.L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and water stress levels differed significantly for most measured characters.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Potassium levels and water stress levelse0
Outcome
most of characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The differ were significantly between Potassium levels and water stress levels in most of characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of water stress and second boron levels increased faba bean plant height, leaf area and grain yield.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
interaction between water stress levels x the second Boron levelse0
Outcome
Plant height ,leaf area and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height ,leaf area and grain yield increased with the interaction between water stress levels x the second Boron levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture, potassium and boron interactions significantly influenced most measured characters.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
interaction between moisture levels x Potassium and boron concentrationse0
Outcome
most of characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“most of characters were significantly influenced by interaction between moisture levels x Potassium and boron concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron did not affect faba bean proline and protein content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Borone0
Outcome
proline and protein contente0
Direction
did not effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boron did not effect the proline and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased faba bean proline and protein.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
proline and proteine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“proline and protein increase with water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1492 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.