Paper · 1996 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Sweet Corn Tolerance and Herbicide Weed Control

Kai Umeda

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

No observable injury was evident by any herbicide treatment on any of the twelve sweet corn varieties during the season. Overall, pendimethalin (Prowl®) treatments applied preemergence (PREE) provided very good control ( >87 %) of all weeds rated. Metolachlor (Dual®), EPTC plus safener (Eradicane®), dimethanamid (Frontier®), and cyanazine ( Bladex®) treatments gave good control ( >80 %) of pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq) with annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus ocf`icinalis) not adequately controlled. All treatments except Bladex alone gave good control of volunteer sudangrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the herbicide treatments visibly injured any of 12 sweet corn varieties.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
any herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
No observablee0
Value
twelvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No observable injury was evident by any herbicide treatment on any of the twelve sweet corn varieties during the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pendimethalin controlled over 87% of all rated weeds.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
pendimethalin (Prowl®) treatments applied preemergence (PREE)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
very goode0
Value
>87 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin (Prowl®) treatments applied preemergence (PREE) provided very good control ( >87 %) of all weeds rated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor controlled over 80% of pigweeds and purslane but did not adequately control annual yellow sweetclover.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Metolachlor (Dual®)e0
Interactor
pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq)e0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
goode0
Value
>80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Metolachlor (Dual®), EPTC plus safener (Eradicane®), dimethanamid (Frontier®), and cyanazine ( Bladex®) treatments gave good control ( >80 %) of pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq) with annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus ocf`icinalis) not adequately controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPTC plus safener controlled over 80% of pigweeds and purslane.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
EPTC plus safener (Eradicane®)e0
Interactor
pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq)e0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
goode0
Value
>80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“EPTC plus safener (Eradicane®), dimethanamid (Frontier®), and cyanazine ( Bladex®) treatments gave good control ( >80 %) of pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq) with annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus ocf`icinalis) not adequately controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethanamid controlled over 80% of pigweeds and purslane.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
dimethanamid (Frontier®)e0
Interactor
pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq)e0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
goode0
Value
>80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“dimethanamid (Frontier®), and cyanazine ( Bladex®) treatments gave good control ( >80 %) of pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq) with annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus ocf`icinalis) not adequately controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanazine controlled over 80% of pigweeds and purslane.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
cyanazine ( Bladex®)e0
Interactor
pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq)e0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
goode0
Value
>80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cyanazine ( Bladex®) treatments gave good control ( >80 %) of pigweeds ( Amaranthus sp.) and purslane (Portulaca oleraceq) with annual yellow sweetclover (Melilotus ocf`icinalis) not adequately controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments other than Bladex alone gave good control of volunteer sudangrass.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
All treatments except Bladex alonee0
Interactor
volunteer sudangrasse0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
goode0
Comparator
Bladex alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments except Bladex alone gave good control of volunteer sudangrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

EPTC · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cyanazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 26 positive, 35 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.