Paper · 2008 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

RESPONSE OF FOLLOWING WINTER CROP SEED GERMINATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH TO RICE STRAW EXTRACT AND RESIDUES

Mona Hamada; I.I El-Oksh; M.S El-Hakeim; et al.

20
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The allelopathic potential of rice straw cv. Giza 178 was evaluated on the germination and seed-ling growth of squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flax. Germination percentage and rate of all studied crop seeds were not affected significantly by aqueous extracts of rice straw, ex-cept for the rate of germination of flax which was delayed by increasing the extract concentration. Shoot length of flax was inhibited by 10.2% with 0.1% dilution, but was stimulated for wheat shoot length by5.6% at undiluted extracts. Seedling length of turnip and flax was stimulated by 46.9& 16.2%, respectively¸ with undiluted extracts. Seed-ling growth response depended on the extract concentration. Squash seedling fresh weight was stimulated by 9.3% at undiluted extract. How-ever all other crop seedling fresh weight was not significantly affected.Residues from rice straw placed in pots of sand had no significant effect on the emergence per-centage and rate of all studied crops, except for emergence percentage of Egyptian berseem and wheat which was increased and the rate of emer-gence of turnip and lentil which were delayed by increasing residue concentration. The flax emerged seedling shoot length and lentil seedling length were inhibited by 9.6% and 14.3%¸ respec-tively, in the presence of low rice straw residues as compared with control. The fresh weight of turnip, lentil, squash and wheat emerged seedling were stimulated by 3.3%, 8.4%, 22.8% and 26.4%¸ re-spectively¸ at higher residue concentration (1%).The stimulation effect by undiluted extract, and higher residue concentration from rice straw tissue may contain water-soluble compounds that exert allelopathic effect on the growth of studied crops under controlled environmental and greenhouse conditions, and it may be recommend to incorpo-rate rice straw in the soil at higher concentration under field conditions. However more research is needed to identify these possible allelopathic com-pounds and demonstrate their potential field condi-tions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw aqueous extracts did not significantly affect germination percentage and rate for most studied crops.

Taxon
squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flaxe1
Treatment
aqueous extracts of rice strawe0
Interactor
rice strawe0weed
Outcome
Germination percentage and ratee0
Direction
not affected significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentage and rate of all studied crop seeds were not affected significantly by aqueous extracts of rice straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–291 · show in text ↑
e1

“The allelopathic potential of rice straw cv. Giza 178 was evaluated on the germination and seed-ling growth of squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flax.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rice straw extract concentration delayed flax germination rate.

Treatment
increasing the extract concentratione0
Outcome
rate of germinatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of germination of flax which was delayed by increasing the extract concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.1% dilution, rice straw extract inhibited flax shoot length by 10.2%.

Treatment
0.1% dilutione0
Outcome
Shoot lengthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
10.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length of flax was inhibited by 10.2% with 0.1% dilution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undiluted extract stimulated wheat shoot length by 5.6%.

Treatment
undiluted extractse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
5.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulated for wheat shoot length by5.6% at undiluted extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undiluted extract stimulated turnip seedling length by 46.9%.

Treatment
undiluted extractse0
Outcome
Seedling lengthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
46.9&e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling length of turnip and flax was stimulated by 46.9& 16.2%, respectively¸ with undiluted extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undiluted extract stimulated flax seedling length by 16.2%.

Treatment
undiluted extractse0
Outcome
Seedling lengthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
16.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling length of turnip and flax was stimulated by 46.9& 16.2%, respectively¸ with undiluted extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undiluted extract stimulated squash seedling fresh weight by 9.3%.

Taxon
Squashe0
Treatment
undiluted extracte0
Outcome
seedling fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
9.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Squash seedling fresh weight was stimulated by 9.3% at undiluted extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other crop seedling fresh weights were not significantly affected by extract.

Taxon
squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flaxe1
Treatment
rice strawe1
Outcome
crop seedling fresh weighte0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“all other crop seedling fresh weight was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“The allelopathic potential of rice straw cv. Giza 178 was evaluated on the germination and seed-ling growth of squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flax.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw residues did not significantly affect emergence percentage and rate of most crops.

Taxon
squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flaxe1
Treatment
Residues from rice strawe0
Outcome
emergence per-centage and ratee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Residues from rice straw placed in pots of sand had no significant effect on the emergence per-centage and rate of all studied crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“The allelopathic potential of rice straw cv. Giza 178 was evaluated on the germination and seed-ling growth of squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flax.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residue concentration raised Egyptian berseem emergence percentage.

Taxon
Egyptian berseeme0
Treatment
increasing residue concentratione0
Outcome
emergence percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“emergence percentage of Egyptian berseem and wheat which was increased and the rate of emer-gence of turnip and lentil which were delayed by increasing residue concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residue concentration raised wheat emergence percentage.

Treatment
increasing residue concentratione0
Outcome
emergence percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence percentage of Egyptian berseem and wheat which was increased and the rate of emer-gence of turnip and lentil which were delayed by increasing residue concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residue concentration delayed turnip emergence rate.

Treatment
increasing residue concentratione0
Outcome
rate of emer-gencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of emer-gence of turnip and lentil which were delayed by increasing residue concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residue concentration delayed lentil emergence rate.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
increasing residue concentratione0
Outcome
rate of emer-gencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of emer-gence of turnip and lentil which were delayed by increasing residue concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low residue inhibited flax shoot length by 9.6% against control.

Treatment
low rice straw residuese0
Outcome
emerged seedling shoot lengthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
9.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flax emerged seedling shoot length and lentil seedling length were inhibited by 9.6% and 14.3%¸ respec-tively, in the presence of low rice straw residues as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low residue inhibited lentil seedling length by 14.3% against control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
low rice straw residuese0
Outcome
seedling lengthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
14.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flax emerged seedling shoot length and lentil seedling length were inhibited by 9.6% and 14.3%¸ respec-tively, in the presence of low rice straw residues as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1% residue, turnip seedling fresh weight increased 3.3%.

Treatment
higher residue concentration (1%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
3.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of turnip, lentil, squash and wheat emerged seedling were stimulated by 3.3%, 8.4%, 22.8% and 26.4%¸ re-spectively¸ at higher residue concentration (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1% residue, lentil seedling fresh weight increased 8.4%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
higher residue concentration (1%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
8.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of turnip, lentil, squash and wheat emerged seedling were stimulated by 3.3%, 8.4%, 22.8% and 26.4%¸ re-spectively¸ at higher residue concentration (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1% residue, squash seedling fresh weight increased 22.8%.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
higher residue concentration (1%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
22.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of turnip, lentil, squash and wheat emerged seedling were stimulated by 3.3%, 8.4%, 22.8% and 26.4%¸ re-spectively¸ at higher residue concentration (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1% residue, wheat seedling fresh weight increased 26.4%.

Treatment
higher residue concentration (1%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
26.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of turnip, lentil, squash and wheat emerged seedling were stimulated by 3.3%, 8.4%, 22.8% and 26.4%¸ re-spectively¸ at higher residue concentration (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1526 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend incorporating rice straw at higher concentration in field soil.

Taxon
squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flaxe1
Outcome
incorpo-rate rice straw in the soil at higher concentration under field conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“it may be recommend to incorpo-rate rice straw in the soil at higher concentration under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1893 · show in text ↑
e1

“The allelopathic potential of rice straw cv. Giza 178 was evaluated on the germination and seed-ling growth of squash, turnip, lentil wheat, Egyptian berseem and flax.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 34 positive, 56 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.