Paper · 2003 · Acta Horticulturae

PRODUCTIVITY OF LETTUCE AND RADISH CULTIVATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF SPACING AND OF TIME OF ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERCROPPING

B.L.A. Resende; G.H.D. Canato; A.B.C. Filho

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at UNESP, Jaboticabal-SP, during the period of September to November of 2000, with the objective of evaluating the productivity of the cultivation of lettuce and radishes as a function of spacing between plants and of the time of establishment of intercropping. The experimental design was a completely randomized blocks and four replications. The 14 treatments consisted of combinations of spacing between lines (0.30 and 0.40 m), cultivation systems (intercropping and monoculture), and time of sowing of radish seeds to establish intercropping (0, 7 and 14 days after transplant of lettuce). The cultivars of lettuce and radish were, 'Tainá' and 'Crimson Gigante', respectively. A greater yield of commercial radish roots was obtained with intercropping cultivation. The fresh mass of lettuce in monoculture did not differ from that produced with intercropping. These results suggest that intercropping cultivation between these species is advantageous.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping produced a greater yield of commercial radish roots.

Treatment
intercropping cultivatione0
Outcome
yield of commercial radish rootse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“A greater yield of commercial radish roots was obtained with intercropping cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce fresh mass in monoculture did not differ from intercropping.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
monoculturee0
Outcome
fresh mass of lettucee0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fresh mass of lettuce in monoculture did not differ from that produced with intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–893 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered lettuce and radish intercropping advantageous.

Taxon
LETTUCE AND RADISHt0
Outcome
intercropping cultivation between these species is advantageouse0

Verbatim

t0

“LETTUCE AND RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“These results suggest that intercropping cultivation between these species is advantageous.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–985 · show in text ↑

rotation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.