Paper · 2011

Effects of seed treatment fungicides and seed vigor oncotton seedling stand and yield in southeastern Arizona in 2009 and 2010

Mary Olsen; Claudia Nischwitz; Randall Norton

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of seed treatment fungicides on cotton seedling stand establishment, skips and yield were assessed in field experiments conducted at the Safford Agricultural Center of the University of Arizona in 2009 and 2010. In 2009, two field trials were conducted, one inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani, the most common cause of damping-off or collapse of seedlings in Arizona, and the other not inoculated. In 2010, the trial was repeated, but the field was not inoculated. Seed of low and high vigor ST4554 BR2RF was treated (1) as a non-treated control; or with (2) base fungicide made up of Baytan + Vortex + Allegiance, (3) base fungicide + Trilex Advanced, (4) base fungicide + Dynasty CST. Seed vigor was based on cool germination percentage. Efficacy of seed fungicide treatments were determined by stand count, seed cotton yield and skip indices. Disease incidence was very low in both years, and effects of fungicide treatments generally made little or no difference in stand establishment or yield. Seed vigor was significant in both years. Results indicate that, under low disease pressure, fungicide seed treatments are marginally effective in increasing stands in the early season, but these increases are not translated into increased yield. The most important variable in these experiments was seed vigor indicating that growers should consider the cool germ percentage of cotton varieties and seed lots when making planting decisions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence was very low in both years.

Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence was very low in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments generally made little or no difference to cotton stand establishment or yield.

Treatment
fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
stand establishment or yielde0
Direction
little or no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of fungicide treatments generally made little or no difference in stand establishment or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed vigor was a significant variable in both years.

Outcome
Seed vigore0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed vigor was significant in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low disease pressure, fungicide seed treatments were marginally effective at raising early stands.

Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse0
Outcome
standse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
under low disease pressuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under low disease pressure, fungicide seed treatments are marginally effective in increasing stands in the early season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early stand increases from fungicide seed treatments did not increase yield.

Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not translated into increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these increases are not translated into increased yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“fungicide seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers should consider cool germination percentage when selecting cotton varieties and seed lots.

Outcome
consider the cool germ percentage of cotton varieties and seed lots when making planting decisionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growers should consider the cool germ percentage of cotton varieties and seed lots when making planting decisions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1452 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Combined applications increased for yield

    Influence of Flower Thrips on Fusarium Hardlock Severity · 2007 · compared with using insecticides alone

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.