Paper · 1970 · Blumea - Biodiversity Evolution and Biogeography of Plants

Biosystematic notes on Atriplex patula L., A. hastata L., and A. littoralis L. (Chenopodiaceae)

R. van der Meijden

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In about 10—15 % of the cases a sharp distinction between Atriplex hastata L., patula L., littoralis L., and glabriuscula Edm. is not possible, both in the field and in the herbarium. In order to establish the status of the ‘intermediates’ a karyological examination was undertaken of 95 samples collected in the Netherlands including both typical specimens and intermediates. It appeared that the specimens clearly representing A. hastata, littoralis, or glabriuscula are diploid (n = 9), but those representing A. patula tetraploid (n = 18). The ‘intermediates’ between A. hastata and patula are either diploid or tetraploid. Hence a sharp distinction between the latter two taxa is only possible on the chromosome number. A similar result was found for the ‘intermediates’ between A. patula and littoralis. It depends on the specific concept one adheres to whether these four taxa should be ranked as species; European botanists usually give them specific rank, their American colleagues infraspecific rank. Autogamy seems to be the rule in these species. This as well as the chromosome numbers found rule out the possibility of hybridization as an explanation for the occurrence of intermediates. I have strong doubts as to the artificial hybrids reported in literature because of the technical difficulties involved and apparently not solved. Special attention has been paid to possible characters to be derived from the leaves, the phyllotaxis, and the bracts. The variation in the leaves of the four species examined is overlapping. The same holds true for the phyllotaxis and the ripe fruits and fruiting bracteoles. An account is given of some abnormalities which have been found during the chromosome countings. An attempt was made to correlate morphological characters of the leaf, especially the leaf-base and leaf-index, and the chromosomes in A. hastata and patula. The results presented in the scatter diagrams show that, though on the whole there is a marked correlation between leafshape and chromosome number, no sharp distinction can be made. Finally a provisional key is given.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear morphological distinction failed in about 10—15 % of cases.

Taxon
Atriplex hastata L.Atriplex calothecae0
Outcome
a sharp distinctione0
Value
10—15 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex calotheca
Atriplex calotheca · Taxon(c) John Barkla, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In about 10—15 % of the cases a sharp distinction between Atriplex hastata L., patula L., littoralis L., and glabriuscula Edm. is not possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. hastata, littoralis and glabriuscula were diploid with n = 9.

Taxon
A. hastataAtriplex calothecae0
Outcome
diploide0
Value
n = 9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex calotheca
Atriplex calotheca · Taxon(c) John Barkla, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. hastata, littoralis, or glabriuscula are diploid (n = 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. patula was tetraploid with n = 18.

Taxon
A. patulaAtriplex patulae0
Outcome
tetraploide0
Value
n = 18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex patula
Atriplex patula · Taxonmieoli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. patula tetraploid (n = 18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–542 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediates between A. hastata and patula were diploid or tetraploid.

Taxon
A. hastataAtriplex calothecae0
Outcome
either diploid or tetraploide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex calotheca
Atriplex calotheca · Taxon(c) John Barkla, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ‘intermediates’ between A. hastata and patula are either diploid or tetraploid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–627 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autogamy appeared usual in these species.

Taxon
Atriplex patula L.Atriplex patulat0
Outcome
Autogamye0
Qualifier
seems to be the rulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex patula
Atriplex patula · Taxonmieoli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Autogamy seems to be the rule in these species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex patula L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf, phyllotaxis, fruit and bracteole variation overlapped among species.

Taxon
Atriplex patula L.Atriplex patulat0
Outcome
variation in the leavese0
Direction
overlappinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex patula
Atriplex patula · Taxonmieoli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in the leaves of the four species examined is overlapping. The same holds true for the phyllotaxis and the ripe fruits and fruiting bracteoles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Atriplex patula L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf shape correlated with chromosome number but did not sharply distinguish taxa.

Taxon
A. hastataAtriplex calothecat0
Organ / stage
leafshapee0
Outcome
leafshapee0
Qualifier
no sharp distinction can be madee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex calotheca
Atriplex calotheca · Taxon(c) John Barkla, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a marked correlation between leafshape and chromosome number, no sharp distinction can be made.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“A. hastata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑