Paper · 1990 · Journal of Apicultural Research

Nectar Production of Selected Cultivars ofBrassica CampestrisL. andBrassica NapusL.

N. A. Mohr; S. C. Jay

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe amount and sugar concentration of nectar produced by two cultivars (Candle, Tobin) of Brassica campestris L. and three cultivars (Altex, Andor, Regent) of Brassica napus L. were determined throughout the day. The effect of temperature and relative humidity on nectar production as well as the preferences for cultivars by honeybees were examined. Cultivars of B. napus produced more nectar than did those of B. campestris. The flowers of both species produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, in the mornings. Correlations were found between the amounts and concentrations of nectar produced and temperature and relative humidity. Flowers sampled repeatedly produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, than did those sampled only once per day. Honeybees did not show obvious preferences for any of the cultivars investigated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus cultivars produced more nectar than B. campestris cultivars.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
nectare0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
B. campestrise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars of B. napus produced more nectar than did those of B. campestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species produced more nectar in the morning.

Taxon
Brassica campestris L.Brassica rapa subsp. oleiferae1
Organ / stage
flowerse0
Outcome
nectare0
Direction
moree0
Setting
in the morningse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowers of both species produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, in the mornings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica campestris L. and three cultivars (Altex, Andor, Regent) of Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species had lower morning nectar sugar concentration.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Organ / stage
flowerse0
Outcome
sugar concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
in the morningse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowers of both species produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, in the mornings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica campestris L. and three cultivars (Altex, Andor, Regent) of Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–183 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nectar amount and concentration correlated with temperature and relative humidity.

Taxon
Brassica NapusL.t0
Outcome
amounts and concentrations of nectar producede0
Qualifier
temperature and relative humiditye0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Correlations were found between the amounts and concentrations of nectar produced and temperature and relative humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica CampestrisL. andBrassica NapusL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatedly sampled flowers produced more nectar than flowers sampled once per day.

Taxon
Brassica NapusL.t0
Treatment
sampled repeatedlye0
Outcome
nectare0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sampled only once per daye0

Verbatim

e0

“Flowers sampled repeatedly produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, than did those sampled only once per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica CampestrisL. andBrassica NapusL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatedly sampled flowers had lower nectar sugar concentration.

Taxon
Brassica NapusL.t0
Treatment
sampled repeatedlye0
Outcome
sugar concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sampled only once per daye0

Verbatim

e0

“Flowers sampled repeatedly produced more nectar, with a lower sugar concentration, than did those sampled only once per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica CampestrisL. andBrassica NapusL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honeybees showed no obvious cultivar preference.

Taxon
Brassica NapusL.t0
Interactor
HoneybeesApis melliferae0pollinator
Outcome
preferences for any of the cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Honeybees did not show obvious preferences for any of the cultivars investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica CampestrisL. andBrassica NapusL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–83 · show in text ↑