Paper · 1998 · Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture

Properities and Effects of Utilizable Materials for Organic Farming in Rice

Young-Hun Moon; Dong-Hoon Oh; Joung-Sik Choi; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects and properties of organic materials, the fermented fowl droppings composts and the top viviparous malleatuses, utilizable for rice farming. At the 35th day after transplanting, the growth of rice plants was good in the order of organic farming, combined farming, conventional farming, and control plot. But stem number and dry weight of rice plant in organic farming decreased a little compared to those in conventional farming at the 65th day after transplanting. Rice yield decreased by 7% in organic farming and by 4% in combined farming compared to those of conventional farming. Weeding effect by inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10a was similarly 96% at the immediately inoculation after transplanting, 98.6% at the 7th days inoculation after transplanting and 70% at the 15th days inoculation after transplanting. By inoculation of 5kg per 10a at the 7th day and the 15th day after transplanting, rice yields decreased by 2% and 5%, respectively, compared to those of the conventional farming method. From the above results, it seems that the organic farming and the combined farming are useful and the inoculation of the top viviparous malleatuses is effective for control of weeds as the environmental preservation farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 35 days, rice growth ranked organic, combined, conventional and control.

Outcome
growth of rice plantse0
Direction
good in the order ofe0
Qualifier
35th day after transplantinge0
Comparator
conventional farming, and control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 35th day after transplanting, the growth of rice plants was good in the order of organic farming, combined farming, conventional farming, and control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 65 days, organic farming reduced rice stem number compared with conventional farming.

Treatment
organic farminge0
Outcome
stem numbere0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
65th day after transplantinge0
Comparator
conventional farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem number and dry weight of rice plant in organic farming decreased a little compared to those in conventional farming at the 65th day after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 65 days, organic farming reduced rice dry weight compared with conventional farming.

Treatment
organic farminge0
Outcome
dry weight of rice plante0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
65th day after transplantinge0
Comparator
conventional farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem number and dry weight of rice plant in organic farming decreased a little compared to those in conventional farming at the 65th day after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic farming reduced rice yield by 7% versus conventional farming.

Treatment
organic farminge0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
conventional farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield decreased by 7% in organic farming and by 4% in combined farming compared to those of conventional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined farming reduced rice yield by 4% versus conventional farming.

Treatment
combined farminge0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4%e0
Comparator
conventional farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield decreased by 7% in organic farming and by 4% in combined farming compared to those of conventional farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation at transplanting had a 96% weeding effect.

Treatment
inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10ae0
Interactor
top viviparous malleatusese0other
Outcome
Weeding effecte0
Value
96%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding effect by inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10a was similarly 96% at the immediately inoculation after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation seven days after transplanting had a 98.6% weeding effect.

Treatment
inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10ae0
Interactor
top viviparous malleatusese0other
Outcome
Weeding effecte0
Value
98.6%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding effect by inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10a was similarly 96% at the immediately inoculation after transplanting, 98.6% at the 7th days inoculation after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation fifteen days after transplanting had a 70% weeding effect.

Treatment
inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10ae1
Interactor
top viviparous malleatusese1other
Outcome
70% at the 15th days inoculation after transplantinge0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“70% at the 15th days inoculation after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation of 5kg or 10kg of the top viviparous malleatuses per 10a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation seven days after transplanting reduced rice yield by 2%.

Treatment
inoculation of 5kg per 10a at the 7th daye0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2%e0
Comparator
conventional farming methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By inoculation of 5kg per 10a at the 7th day and the 15th day after transplanting, rice yields decreased by 2% and 5%, respectively, compared to those of the conventional farming method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation fifteen days after transplanting reduced rice yield by 5%.

Treatment
inoculation of 5kg per 10a at the 7th day and the 15th day after transplantinge0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
conventional farming methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By inoculation of 5kg per 10a at the 7th day and the 15th day after transplanting, rice yields decreased by 2% and 5%, respectively, compared to those of the conventional farming method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged organic and combined farming useful for environmental preservation farming.

Outcome
organic farming and the combined farming are usefule0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic farming and the combined farming are useful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“as the environmental preservation farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 125 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 125 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 382 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.