Paper · 2012 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Weed management in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) with special reference to buttercup weed (Ranunculus spp) in north-west Himalayas

Raman Jeet Singh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An on-farm trial was conducted at five farmer fields of Bageshwar district of Uttrakhand to validate, refine and popularize the technology developed by VPKAS, Almora for managing Buttercup (Ranunculus spp) during 2007–10. The aim of the study was to find out the effectiveness of 2,4-D @ 1.0 kg ai/ha, isoproturon @ 1.0 kg ai/ha and tank mix application of 2,4-D @ 0.5 kg ai/ha with isoproturon @ 1.0 kg ai/ha over farmers practice of hand weeding twice at 30 and 60 DAS and unweeded control on the infestation of weeds and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori and Paol.). Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha) at 35-40 DAS reduced the density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weeds and nutrient uptake by weeds (3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/ha) compared to farmers practice. This combination also resulted in 12.5% higher grain yield, nutrients by wheat (73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/ha) and net returns (` 19 030/ha) With this technology, drudgery reduction of about 475-man days/ha can be made possible, which could be used in other fruitful activities of hilly farmers, particularly women.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix reduced Ranunculus density versus farmer practice.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
RanunculusRanunculuse0weed
Outcome
the density and dry weight of Ranunculuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ranunculus
Ranunculus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hanay · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha) at 35-40 DAS reduced the density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weeds and nutrient uptake by weeds (3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/ha) compared to farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix reduced Ranunculus dry weight versus farmer practice.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
RanunculusRanunculuse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of Ranunculuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ranunculus
Ranunculus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hanay · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha) at 35-40 DAS reduced the density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weeds and nutrient uptake by weeds (3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/ha) compared to farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix reduced density of other weeds versus farmer practice.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
RanunculusRanunculuse0weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ranunculus
Ranunculus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hanay · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha) at 35-40 DAS reduced the density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weeds and nutrient uptake by weeds (3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/ha) compared to farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix reduced weed nutrient uptake versus farmer practice.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
RanunculusRanunculuse0weed
Outcome
nutrient uptake by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/hae0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ranunculus
Ranunculus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hanay · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tank mix application of 2, 4-D+isoproturon (0.50+1.0 kg/ha) at 35-40 DAS reduced the density and dry weight of Ranunculus and other weeds and nutrient uptake by weeds (3.9 kg N, 0.9 kg P and 6.2 kg K/ha) compared to farmers practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix increased wheat grain yield by 12.5%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
This combinatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“This combination also resulted in 12.5% higher grain yield, nutrients by wheat (73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/ha) and net returns (` 19 030/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nutrient uptake under the combination was 73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/ha.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
nutrients by wheate0
Value
73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“This combination also resulted in 12.5% higher grain yield, nutrients by wheat (73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/ha) and net returns (` 19 030/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination yielded net returns of ` 19 030/ha.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
` 19 030/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“This combination also resulted in 12.5% higher grain yield, nutrients by wheat (73.5 kg N, 11.6 kg P and 60.0 kg K/ha) and net returns (` 19 030/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–976 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors estimate this technology could save about 475-man days/ha of drudgery.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
drudgery reductione0
Value
about 475-man days/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“With this technology, drudgery reduction of about 475-man days/ha can be made possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1063 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · Ranunculus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.