Abstract
Two sub-blocks were distinguished in a pot experiment with carrot ‘Kazan F1’ cultivation: with and without plant foliar application. The plants were treated thrice with foliarly applied 2% urea solution, 1% solution of ‘Supervit R’ multicomponent fertilizer and again with 2% urea solution. Nitrogen fertilization used within the sub-blocks included: the control (unfertilized with nitrogen), Ca(NO3)2, NH4NO3, (NH4)2SO4 and CO(NH2)2. The roots of plants fertilized with (NH4)2SO4 contained the largest quantities of Cd and Zn. The forms of fertilizer (N) did not affect carrot Cu concentrations. Foliar application raised Cu contents but had no statistically significant effect on Cd or Zn concentrations in carrot. Sylwester Smolen, Wlodzimierz Sady 88
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulfate fertilization gave the largest root Cd quantities.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotat0 - Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- (NH4)2SO4e0
- Outcome
- quantities of Cde0
- Direction
- largeste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The roots of plants fertilized with (NH4)2SO4 contained the largest quantities of Cd and Zn”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulfate fertilization gave the largest root Zn quantities.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- (NH4)2SO4e0
- Outcome
- quantities of Cd and Zne0
- Direction
- largeste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The roots of plants fertilized with (NH4)2SO4 contained the largest quantities of Cd and Zn”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer form did not affect carrot Cu concentration.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- forms of fertilizer (N)e0
- Outcome
- Cu concentrationse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The forms of fertilizer (N) did not affect carrot Cu concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application raised Cu content.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- Foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- Cu contentse0
- Direction
- raisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application raised Cu contents”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application had no statistically significant effect on Cd concentration.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- Foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- Cd or Zn concentrationse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application raised Cu contents but had no statistically significant effect on Cd or Zn concentrations in carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application had no statistically significant effect on Zn concentration.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- Foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- Cd or Zn concentrationse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application raised Cu contents but had no statistically significant effect on Cd or Zn concentrations in carrot”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: content · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.