Paper · 2015 · Field Crops Research

Physiological basis of yield variation in response to row spacing and plant density of mungbean grown in subtropical environments

Rao C.N. Rachaputi; Yashvir Chauhan; Col Douglas; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the extent and physiological bases of yield variation due to row spacing and plant density configuration in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments. Field trials were conducted in six production environments; one rain-fed and one irrigated trial each at Biloela and Emerald, and one rain-fed trial each at Hermitage and Kingaroy sites in Queensland, Australia. In each trial, six combinations of spatial arrangement of plants, achieved through two inter-row spacings of 1 m or 0.9 m (wide row), 0.5 m or 0.3 m (narrow row), with three plant densities, 20, 30 and 40 plants/m 2 , were compared. The narrow row spacing resulted in 22% higher shoot dry matter and 14% more yield compared to the wide rows. The yield advantage of narrow rows ranged from 10% to 36% in the two irrigated and three rain-fed trials. However, yield loss of up to 10% was also recorded from narrow rows at Emerald where the crop suffered severe drought. Neither the effects of plant density, nor the interaction between plant density and row spacing, however, were significant in any trial. The yield advantage of narrow rows was related to 22% more intercepted radiation. In addition, simulations by the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator model, using site-specific agronomy, soil and weather information, suggested that narrow rows had proportionately greater use of soil water through transpiration, compared to evaporation resulting in higher yield per mm of soil water. The long-term simulation of yield probabilities over 123 years for the two row configurations showed that the mungbean crop planted in narrow rows could produce up to 30% higher grain yield compared to wide rows in 95% of the seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing gave 22% higher shoot dry matter than wide rows in mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow row spacinge1
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
highere1
Value
22%e1
Comparator
wide rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“The narrow row spacing resulted in 22% higher shoot dry matter and 14% more yield compared to the wide rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing gave 14% more yield than wide rows in mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow row spacinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
14%e1
Comparator
wide rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“The narrow row spacing resulted in 22% higher shoot dry matter and 14% more yield compared to the wide rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield advantage of narrow rows in mungbean ranged from 10% to 36% across irrigated and rain-fed trials.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
yield advantagee1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
10% to 36%e1
Setting
the two irrigated and three rain-fed trialse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield advantage of narrow rows ranged from 10% to 36% in the two irrigated and three rain-fed trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow rows lost up to 10% yield at Emerald, where the crop suffered severe drought.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
yield losse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
up to 10%e1
Qualifier
severe droughte1
Setting
Emeralde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, yield loss of up to 10% was also recorded from narrow rows at Emerald where the crop suffered severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density had no significant effect on mungbean in any trial.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
plant densitye1
Outcome
effects of plant densitye1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in any triale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neither the effects of plant density, nor the interaction between plant density and row spacing, however, were significant in any trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between plant density and row spacing had no significant effect on mungbean in any trial.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
row spacinge1
Outcome
interaction between plant density and row spacinge1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in any triale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neither the effects of plant density, nor the interaction between plant density and row spacing, however, were significant in any trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield advantage of narrow rows in mungbean was related to 22% more intercepted radiation.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
intercepted radiatione1
Direction
moree1
Value
22%e1
Qualifier
yield advantage of narrow rows was related toe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield advantage of narrow rows was related to 22% more intercepted radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulations suggested narrow rows had greater soil-water use through transpiration than evaporation in mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
use of soil water through transpiratione1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
evaporatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggested that narrow rows had proportionately greater use of soil water through transpiration, compared to evaporation resulting in higher yield per mm of soil water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulations suggested narrow rows gave higher yield per mm of soil water in mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
yield per mm of soil watere1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggested that narrow rows had proportionately greater use of soil water through transpiration, compared to evaporation resulting in higher yield per mm of soil water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term simulation over 123 years indicated narrow rows could give up to 30% higher grain yield than wide rows in 95% of seasons.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
Crystale0
Treatment
narrow rowse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
up to 30%e1
Qualifier
in 95% of the seasonse1
Comparator
wide rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] variety “Crystal” grown in different subtropical environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“The long-term simulation of yield probabilities over 123 years for the two row configurations showed that the mungbean crop planted in narrow rows could produce up to 30% higher grain yield compared to wide rows in 95% of the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1785 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.