Paper · 2000 · Journal of Range Management

Grass Response to Seasonal Burns in Experimental Plantings

Henry F. Howe

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 6-year experiment examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin. Synthetic communities of C3 and C4 grasses were seeded (100 seeds m-2 species-1) in 1992 and subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned. By 1994 all plots were virtual monocultures of the C3 reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). By the second post-season sample in 1998, total productivity of plots burned in May was higher (781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1) than those burned in August (362 +/- 28 g m-2 year-1) or left unburned (262 +/- 43 g m-2 year-1) due to the incursions of either the C4 grasses big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L), or both. These large late-season grasses are much more productive per area covered than P. arundinacea or the other two C3 grasses present, Elymus virginicus L. and Poa pratensis L. Even at this early stage of succession, C4 production in plots burned in May was 5 to 6 times that in the other 2 treatments. August burns produced a mix of C3 and C4 grasses but did not strongly favor the pre-treatment C3 dominant P. arundinacea. Unburned plots most resembled those burned in August in species composition, but differed in having 4 times the accumulated litter, perhaps foretelling divergence in C3 and C4 composition as succession proceeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By the second post-season sample in 1998, May-burned plots had higher total productivity than August-burned plots.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
prescribed burns in Maye2
Outcome
total productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1e1
Qualifier
By the second post-season sample in 1998e1
Comparator
those burned in Auguste1
Setting
southern Wisconsine0

Verbatim

e0

“examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“By the second post-season sample in 1998, total productivity of plots burned in May was higher (781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1) than those burned in August (362 +/- 28 g m-2 year-1) or left unburned (262 +/- 43 g m-2 year-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–599 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By the second post-season sample in 1998, May-burned plots had higher total productivity than unburned plots.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
prescribed burns in Maye2
Outcome
total productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1e1
Qualifier
By the second post-season sample in 1998e1
Comparator
left unburnede1
Setting
southern Wisconsine0

Verbatim

e0

“examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“By the second post-season sample in 1998, total productivity of plots burned in May was higher (781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1) than those burned in August (362 +/- 28 g m-2 year-1) or left unburned (262 +/- 43 g m-2 year-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–599 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C4 production in May-burned plots was 5 to 6 times that in the other two treatments early in succession.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
prescribed burns in Maye2
Outcome
C4 productione3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
5 to 6 timese3
Comparator
the other 2 treatmentse3
Setting
southern Wisconsine0

Verbatim

e0

“examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–277 · show in text ↑
e3

“C4 production in plots burned in May was 5 to 6 times that in the other 2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August burns produced a mix of C3 and C4 grasses and did not strongly favor Phalaris arundinacea.

Taxon
P. arundinaceaPhalaris arundinaceae5
Treatment
August burnse5
Outcome
mix of C3 and C4 grassese5
Qualifier
did not strongly favore5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris arundinacea
Phalaris arundinacea · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“August burns produced a mix of C3 and C4 grasses but did not strongly favor the pre-treatment C3 dominant P. arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 1994 all plots were virtual monocultures of Phalaris arundinacea.

Taxon
Phalaris arundinaceaPhalaris arundinaceae4
Outcome
virtual monoculturese4
Qualifier
By 1994e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris arundinacea
Phalaris arundinacea · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“By 1994 all plots were virtual monocultures of the C3 reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unburned plots had 4 times the accumulated litter of August-burned plots.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
left unburnede2
Outcome
accumulated littere6
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
4 timese6
Comparator
those burned in Auguste6

Verbatim

e0

“examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–277 · show in text ↑
e6

“Unburned plots most resembled those burned in August in species composition, but differed in having 4 times the accumulated litter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unburned plots most resembled August-burned plots in species composition.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
left unburnede2
Outcome
species compositione6
Comparator
those burned in Auguste6

Verbatim

e0

“examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–277 · show in text ↑
e6

“Unburned plots most resembled those burned in August in species composition, but differed in having 4 times the accumulated litter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1284 · show in text ↑